Abstract
The main function of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is to remove low-density lipoprotein (LDL) from blood vessels through reverse cholesterol transport. In addition, HDL has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Low HDL level is an independent risk factor for development of coronary artery disease. To manage patients with low HDL levels, general measures such as lifestyle modification, controlling acute metabolic syndrome, and participating in regular endurance exercise are essential. Smoking cessation is a must, and it will often improve HDL levels by 5% to 10%. While statin therapy is the backbone therapy for controlling LDL levels, it also results in elevation of HDL levels by at least 5%. Specific pharmacologic interventions to improve HDL level and function have been disappointing. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is the key metabolic pathway to transfer HDL to LDL; thus, CETP inhibitors result in elevation of HDL levels. Several products were tested in large controlled studies, such as dalcetrapib and evacetrapib; neither resulted in any clinical benefit. Anacetrapib only resulted in very limited benefit and is no longer under active development. The most recent study utilized apolipoprotein A1 infusion in high-risk patients shortly after acute myocardial infarction. There was no benefit in the primary end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. In patients with low HDL, a strategy of having LDL as low as can be possibly achieved may be the most appropriate approach.
Cholesterol was first described in the human gall bladder in 1769 as cholesterol stones. The name is derived from chole meaning bile, and stereos meaning solid. In the following two centuries, cholesterol was found in human blood and in atherosclerotic plaques in the walls of blood vessels. In the early 1950s, the association was made between cholesterol blood levels and cardiovascular disease.1 Subsequently, multiple observational epidemiologic studies confirmed the association between dietary cholesterol and elevation of serum cholesterol levels and an increase in the incidence of atherosclerotic heart disease.2 The Framingham heart study was launched in the city of Framingham, Massachusetts in the year 1948. This seminal study was conducted under the direction of the National Institute of Health and the National Heart Institute, which became known as the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). The purpose of the study was to conduct a controlled epidemiologic study of the incidence of coronary heart disease and to identify its various risk factors.3 The Framingham heart study included longitudinal follow up of about 15,000 subjects, comprising three generations of the population of that city. In 1961, WB Kannel et al., as part of the Framingham study, established that abnormalities in blood cholesterol were an important risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease (CAD).4 Since then, many therapies emerged as effective modalities for decreasing low density lipoprotein (LDL), with marked decrease in the risk of CAD. Improving low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), which is an important risk factor, proved to be a more challenging task. This review will focus on the management of patients with low levels of HDL.
Methods
PubMed was used as the main source for this literature review. We reviewed articles about the history of cholesterol between the years 1975 to 2024. We also reviewed articles about LDL, dyslipidemia, and apolipoprotein A from 2004 to 2024. The key words utilized were dyslipidemia, low HDL high triglycerides, management of low HDL, and risk factors of cardiac events. PubMed was utilized for the search. Only articles published in English were included. Case reports were excluded. Special emphasis was placed on multi centered trials. All article titles were reviewed. Relevant articles were selected by the two authors, were critically reviewed, and constitute the basis of this report.
Introduction to Atherosclerosis
The atherosclerotic process occurs over time starting with damage to the endothelium via a number of risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes, aging, and various toxins. Lipids, including LDL, and inflammatory cells accumulate in the wall of the blood vessel with eventual fibrosis and calcification. As the blood vessel narrows, it may compromise oxygen delivery downstream resulting in symptoms such as angina when it affects the coronary arteries and claudication when it affects the peripheral arteries. Vulnerable plaques, with large lipid cores, inflammatory cells and a thin endothelial cap, are prone to rupture. Thrombi may form to seal off the rupture but may end up occluding the blood vessel depriving the downstream organ of oxygen and nutrients, leading to devastating consequences such as myocardial infarction or stroke.
LDL in the Atherosclerotic Plaque
The LDL that infiltrates the blood vessel becomes oxidized by oxygen free radicals, which are key inflammatory components, and which is a very important process in the promotion of atherosclerosis. In addition to the risk factors involved in the atherosclerotic process, several genes encoding for proteins and growth factors, such as monocyte chemoattractant protein I, and platelet derived growth factors have been identified, which promote the atherosclerotic process.5 The main type of cholesterol that leads to the formation of atherosclerotic plaque is LDL, which comes in part from a high cholesterol diet. LDL synthesis also occurs in the liver and depends on the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. The LDL level in the blood also depends on the number of LDL receptors on the hepatocytes. When there is an increase in the number of receptors, the receptors bind more LDL from the blood, thus decreasing serum levels of LDL. The receptors are also regulated by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). Inhibition of this protein will increase LDL receptors, thus resulting in a decrease in LDL levels. While cholesterol esters are fat soluble, they cannot circulate in the blood as such; however, they are surrounded by a capsule of phospholipids and proteins, forming lipoprotein to circulate in the blood. They are divided into four categories: chylomicron transport triglycerides; very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), composed of triglyceride, cholesterol, and phospholipids; LDL, and HDL.6
HDL and Atherosclerosis
While LDL is an important risk factor for the development and progression of atherosclerosis, HDL protects blood vessels from developing that process. Initially in 1951, research studies found patients with documented CAD who had low levels of HDL. In 1977, it was very clear that low HDL was a risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis. In a review of the HDL hypothesis, it was reported that with an increase in the level of HDL by 1 mg/dL, there was a 2% to 3% decrease in the rate of atherosclerosis.7 HDL acts as an acceptor of cellular LDL, leading to reverse cholesterol transport (a process that moves cholesterol from blood vessels in peripheral tissues to the liver for excretion). In addition, HDL exerts other beneficial effects on blood vessel endothelium. It inhibits expression of endothelial adhesion molecules and also has antioxidant effects, both of which add to its value for the health of blood vessels.
Since HDL promotes the efflux of LDL from atherosclerotic plaques, it is very beneficial in protecting blood vessels from atherosclerotic disease. Its value is more pronounced when there is an elevation of serum LDL levels. The more LDL is available, the greater the need for HDL. Interestingly, in patients with Tangier disease, an inherited disorder characterized by a very low HDL and low LDL, the incidence of premature atherosclerosis is not a prominent occurrence in this disease. Thus, in patients with low LDL levels, the value and need for HDL is attenuated.8 To protect from the development of atherosclerotic disease, it is necessary to manage elevated LDL levels, while at the same time enhancing HDL production.
Management of Elevated LDL
Patients with elevated LDL levels should be advised to maintain a heart healthy diet as well as develop healthy lifestyle modifications. However, it was the discovery of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and their role in controlling LDL synthesis that led to the development of statins, which proved to be the backbone of cholesterol management and control of CAD.
In 1996, Sacks et. al. reported the results of the CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events) study.9 A total of 4159 patients with total cholesterol of about 240 mg/dL and LDL of about 140 mg/dL, and who suffered myocardial infarction, were randomized to treatment of 40 mg pravastatin or placebo and were followed for 5 years. Those cholesterol levels were targeted in the study because they were considered average levels at that time. The frequency of coronary events, coronary revascularization, and strokes was less in the pravastatin group.9 In 1998, the LIPID (Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease) study group reported pravastatin also showed reduced mortality from coronary heart disease as well as total mortality at 6 years of follow up after starting pravastatin.10
Statins work to lower LDL primarily by inhibiting the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase, which is responsible for cholesterol synthesis in the liver. There are other pharmacologic agents used to treat high LDL, besides statins, that have different mechanisms of action. Ezetimide blocks the cholesterol absorption in the small intestine. The mechanism of PCSK9 inhibitors prevent the degradation of LDL receptors on the surface of hepatocytes. Bempedoic acid interferes with cholesterol synthesis in the liver.
With time, it was clear that the goals for cholesterol levels were not optimal, which led to testing more intensive therapy for cholesterol control. Cannon et al.,11 in 2004, published the results of the PROVE-IT study. They enrolled 4162 patients with acute coronary syndromes who were randomized to treatment with 40 mg of pravastatin daily or 80 mg of atorvastatin (a more potent statin) daily. Patients were followed for 2 years. At the conclusion of the study, LDL in the pravastatin group was 95 mg/dL, versus 62 mg/dL in the atorvastatin group. This level of 62 mg/dL was associated with a decrease in composite end points of myocardial infarction, need for revascularization, and death from any cause. Thus, the level of 62 mg/dL achieved with 80 mg of atorvastatin was associated with less composite end points when compared with a weaker statin (pravastatin.) The IMPROVE-IT study randomized 18,144 patients with acute coronary syndrome to either 40 mg simvastatin daily or a combination of 40 mg simvastatin plus 10 mg of ezetimibe.12 While statins alone or in combination with ezetimibe may increase liver enzymes in some patients or cause myopathy, there was no statistically significant difference between treatment and control groups. Although studies showed cardiac benefit in the treatment groups, it also confirmed safety in the treatment groups.11,12 The group that received both simvastatin plus ezetimibe achieved LDL levels of 53.7 mg/dL, which provided additional benefits to cardiovascular events at median follow up of 6 years.
For patients who do not achieve the recommended targets despite statin therapy or do not tolerate statins, there are other options that can be utilized. Ezetimide can be added, as shown in the IMPROVE-IT study.12 Monoclonal antibodies that inhibit PCSK9, such as evolocumab13 and alirocumab,14 result in marked reduction of LDL with significant benefits for cardiovascular events. There was no statistically significant difference in side effects between treatment groups, except in rare occurrence of injection site reactions.13-16 More recently, inclisiran, which is a small interfering RNA molecule that reduces the production of PCSK9 protein in the liver, injected twice yearly, showed similar benefits.15,16 In clinical trials, bempedoic acid was shown to reduce LDL cholesterol by 17%–28% following 12 weeks of therapy.17 These new innovations can result in very low levels of LDL, substantially below recommended target levels, without any significant side effects.
Management of Low HDL
Since 1950, it has become clear there is an inverse relationship between HDL level and the risk of developing CAD.18 Low HDL is an important risk factor for development of CAD, independent of the level of LDL.19 HDL is a nanoparticle capable of mediating multiple functions on different biologic systems.20 The function of HDL is not just protection from atherosclerosis, since it is present in multiple atherosclerotic free species. The main mechanism by which HDL removes LDL from blood vessels is through the reverse cholesterol transport pathway. HDL combines with LDL from atherosclerotic plagues and macrophages, returns it to the liver, where it is then eliminated from the body. In addition, HDL molecules have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and vasodilator properties, which all add to the clear benefit of HDL.21 The normal level of HDL in men over 20 years-of-age is 40 mg/dL or higher. In women over 20 years-of-age, it is 50 mg/dL or higher. The level of HDL is important for the protection of blood vessels, yet the function of HDL is equally important. Many types of HDL exist. In general, the lighter, larger size molecule is HDL2, and its main function is reverse cholesterol transport. The smaller molecule is called HDL3, and its main function is anti-inflammatory in nature. If a person develops autoimmune disease, infection, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease, the HDL particle function will decrease, with less blood vessel protection.18
While in general the higher HDL level, the fewer cardiac events in most patients, there is some evidence that some patients with a very high HDL level may not necessarily show any cardiac benefit. Chen et al.22 studied the effect of HDL on patients following percutaneous coronary angioplasty. They followed 7284 patients for a mean of 4 years after coronary angioplasty. The patients were divided into three groups according to HDL level: < 25 mg/dL, 25-60 mg/dL, and > 60 mg/dL. While the higher level of HDL was protective and associated with fewer cardiac events and less mortality, a very low level (< 25 mg/dL) or a level higher than 60 mg/dL was associated with higher risk and higher mortality. The exact mechanism is not clear, but it may be related to the fact that when patients have a very high level (> 70 mg/dL in men or > 90 mg/dL in women), the functionality of HDL particles may be diminished.
There are clear racial differences for the value of HDL. Over a 10-year period, follow up of 23,901 normal individuals was performed in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) study cohort, and while low HDL level was a clear risk factor for a white population, it did not significantly increase cardiac risk in a black population.23
It seems the value of HDL is more pronounced in patients with elevated LDL. In two uncommon congenital diseases, Tangier disease and lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT) deficiency disease, the HDL is markedly diminished, and LDL is low as well.24 Follow up of these patients showed there was a low risk for premature atherosclerosis. Thus, while low HDL level is a clear risk factor in patients with elevated LDL, this may not be the case in the presence of low LDL.
HDL, in addition to reverse cholesterol transport, has other functions that are protective to the blood vessels, mainly anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.25-28 These are mainly mediated by HDL3. The higher the HDL, the lower the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and fibrinogen, and the lower the mortality. The antioxidant effect prevents blood vessel damage by oxygen free radicals. The treatment of low HDL is discussed in the following paragraphs.
Treatment of Low HDL
There are general measures that improve HDL, yet with attenuated effect. Changes in lifestyle, controlling acute metabolic syndrome with reducing insulin resistance, and improving diabetes may result in some increase in HDL.18 Life style changes should be considered in most patients.
Regular endurance exercise is effective in increasing HDL level, and it is most important in patients with low HDL and elevated triglycerides.29 Exercise duration – not frequency – is an important factor in the rise of HDL. In a meta-analysis by Kodama et al.,30 every 10 minutes of prolongation of exercise was associated with a rise in HDL of 1.4 mg/dL Exercise not only increases the number of HDL particles, but also its functionality. Exercise enhances reverse cholesterol transport and potentiates anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects.31
Smoking cessation will likely increase HDL by 5%–10%, an important measure of priority in the management of low HDL.18 Moderate alcohol consumption raises HDL level by increasing the transport rate of apolipoprotein A-I and A-II.32 The deferential effect on various subfractions of HDL is controversial and is not yet resolved.
Niacin
Many decades ago several studies tested the value of niacin in patients with significantly higher cholesterol compared to today’s standards.33 A total of 2531 patients were randomized to clofibrate, niacin, or placebo. Niacin showed an increase in HDL by only 6%, with some benefit in cardiac events.
In 2011, the AIM-HIGH study was reported. It randomized 3414 patients with dyslipidemia to extended release niacin or placebo.34 All patients initially received simvastatin plus ezetimide to lower their LDL cholesterol to a mean of 62 mg/dL. There was no benefit of adding extended release niacin to patients after 2 years of therapy. Thus, while there was some benefit of niacin when LDL was elevated, no benefit was observed in patients with controlled LDL.
Statins and HDL
The role of statins in lowering LDL level is well established and accepted in the guidelines for management of dyslipidemia. Statins may also result in a small increase in HDL. In most studies, HDL increases after statin therapy by about 5%–10%. The full mechanism by which this occurs is not completely clear, but at least in part, it may be secondary to a decrease in the rate of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) flow of cholesterol from the molecule of HDL.35 The STELLAR trial was an open label, 6-week trial to compare the effect of pravastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin on LDL and HDL.36 Rosuvastatin was associated with the greatest increase in HDL level, up to 10% increase, as compared with other statins. The increase in HDL level was independent of the degree of decrease in LDL.37 Thus, patients should receive statins not only to improve their LDL levels, but also to improve and elevate their HDL levels.
Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitors
Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors decrease HDL transfer, resulting in an increase in the number of HDL particles. In a study by Schwartz et al.,38 the authors suggested this increase in HDL levels by CTEP inhibitors might have a therapeutic potential and reduce CAD. They tested the CTEP inhibitor dalcetrapid in a study of 15,871 patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome who were randomized to either the drug or placebo and were followed for 31 months. While the HDL did increase significantly in the dalcetrapid group, the primary end point of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiac arrest, and stroke were similar between the active treatment group and the placebo. Dalcetrapib increased patients’ blood pressure and increased the degree of inflammation, which may have neutralized any potential benefit.38
The ACCELERATE trial tested the CTEP inhibitor evacetrapib in patients with high risk vascular disease.39 Despite a significant rise in HDL level at 3 months of evacetrapib therapy, there was no clinical benefit, and it seemed the increase in HDL particles was not associated with any increase in functionality of the particles. The only CETP inhibitor with some benefit in patients at high risk for CAD was anacetrapib, yet after 4 years of therapy, the magnitude of benefit was still quite limited.40 This drug was dropped by the company and is no longer being developed. Thus, despite more than a decade of development in CETP inhibitor drugs, there does not appear to be any significant potential in the management of low HDL.
Apolipoprotein A1 infusions
Apolipoprotein A1 infusion increases cholesterol efflux from the vascular system. It was logical to try the infusion in high risk patients following acute myocardial infarction. Gibson et al.41 conducted a double blind, placebo controlled trial in 18,219 patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction within 5 day after the first medical contact to receive either four weekly infusions of 6 gm of human apolipoprotein A1 or placebo. All patients were very high risk and had multi-vessel CAD. Study end points were a composite end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death at 90 days of follow up. At randomization, the baseline LDL level was 84 mg/dL, and HDL level was 39 mg/dL. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between the active treatment group and the placebo group in this study of a cohort with low LDL levels. It was another negative study utilizing an active pharmacologic agent to enhance the function of HDL.41
Other Medications
Many studies described the effect of the omega III fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acid on lipids. Their main effect is on triglycerides, but they minimally increase HDL. Clinical studies showed minimal benefit, and the studies were not always consistent. Only icosapent ethyl (Vascepa®) has shown a clear benefit on cardiovascular outcome when combined with diet and lifestyle modification.42 The benefit of icosapent ethyl may be due to its lowering of triglycerides.
Conclusion
Dyslipidemia is an important modifiable risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease and the development of various cardiovascular events. The main component that increases the atherosclerotic progression of the disease is LDL. It is now clear that the main goal is to decrease LDL levels according to currently accepted guidelines with early diet modification and the use of statins. In patients who still cannot achieve the goals or who are intolerant to statins, other alternatives such as ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors should be utilized. The important component that results in efflux of cholesterol from the vessel wall is HDL. Thus, low HDL may deprive the body of such a protective mechanism. Patients with low HDL levels should be started on life change modifications, regular endurance exercise, smoking cessation, and improving hemoglobin A1C. While this should be attempted in all patients, it may result in only modest benefit. Statins elevate HDL levels, but at a limited scale. Targeted pharmacologic interventions to improve HDL so far have been disappointing, with no clear significant benefit.
Since the main value of HDL is to clear cholesterol from atherosclerotic plaques, the impact of low HDL is more pronounced in patients with elevated LDL. In a congenital disease like Tangier disease, in which there is low LDL and absence of or very low HDL, the occurrence of cardiac events is usually very low as well. The majority of pharmacologic interventions were conducted on patients with very low LDL; thus, until we have a promising drug to treat low HDL, management should include treating LDL level to as low as possibly achievable. A summary of various measures to lower LDL and improve HDL are displayed in Figure 1.
A summary of the main measures to lower LDL and raise HDL cholesterol. LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein.
Footnotes
Disclosures: The authors have reported no financial support or conflicts of interest related to this work.
- Received October 17, 2024.
- Revision received April 24, 2025.
- Revision received May 2, 2025.
- Accepted May 13, 2025.
References
- 1.↵Kuijpers PMJC. History in medicine: the story of cholesterol, lipids and cardiology. European Society of Cardiology. E-Journal of Cardiology Practice. 2021;19(9). https://www.escardio.org/Journals/E-Journal-of-Cardiology-Practice/Volume-19/history-in-medicine-the-story-of-cholesterol-lipids-and-cardiology
- 2.↵McGill HC Jr. The relationship of dietary cholesterol to serum cholesterol concentration and to atherosclerosis in man. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979;32(12 Suppl):2664-2702. doi:10.1093/ajcn/32.12.2664
- 3.↵Andersson C, Johnson AD, Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vasan RS. 70-year legacy of the Framingham Heart Study. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(11):687-698. doi:10.1038/s41569-019-0202-5
- 4.↵Kannel WB, Dawber TR, Kagan A, Revotskie N, Stokes J 3rd. Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease--six year follow-up experience. The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1961;55:33-50. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-55-1-33
- 5.↵Walton KW. Hyperlipidaemia and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Adv Drug Res. 1974;9:55-67.
- 6.↵Goldstein JL, Brown MS. The low-density lipoprotein pathway and its relation to atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:897-930. doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.004341
- 7.↵Vergeer M, Holleboom AG, Kastelein JJ, Kuivenhoven JA. The HDL hypothesis: does high-density lipoprotein protect from atherosclerosis?. J Lipid Res. 2010;51(8):2058-2073. doi:10.1194/jlr.R001610
- 8.↵Berger GM. High-density lipoproteins in the prevention of atherosclerotic heart disease. Part I. Epidemiological and family studies. S Afr Med J. 1978;54(17):689-693.
- 9.↵Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(14):1001-1009. doi:10.1056/NEJM199610033351401
- 10.↵Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(19):1349-1357. doi:10.1056/NEJM199811053391902
- 11.↵Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 16;354(7):778]. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1495-1504. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040583
- 12.↵Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387-2397. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1410489
- 13.↵Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1713-1722. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1615664
- 14.↵Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2097-2107. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1801174
- 15.↵Ray KK, Landmesser U, Leiter LA, Inclisiran in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1430-1440. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1615758
- 16.↵Raal FJ, Kallend D, Ray KK, Inclisiran for the Treatment of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1520-1530. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1913805
- 17.↵Blumenthal RS, Shay Martin S. Bempedoic acid for LDL-C lowering: what do we know? American College of Cardiology. August 10, 2020. Available at: https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2020/08/10/08/21/Bempedoic-Acid-for-LDL-C-Lowering. Accessed 9/30/2024.
- 18.↵von Eckardstein A, Nordestgaard BG, Remaley AT, Catapano AL. High-density lipoprotein revisited: biological functions and clinical relevance. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(16):1394-1407. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac605
- 19.↵Bonilha I, Luchiari B, Nadruz W, Sposito AC. Very low HDL levels: clinical assessment and management. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2023;67(1):3-18. doi:10.20945/2359-3997000000585
- 20.↵Sposito AC. HDL metrics, let’s call the number thing off?. Atherosclerosis. 2016;251:525-527. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.06.044
- 21.↵Rothblat GH, Phillips MC. High-density lipoprotein heterogeneity and function in reverse cholesterol transport. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2010;21(3):229-238. doi:10.1097/mol.0b013e328338472d
- 22.↵Chen XF, Xiang YF, Cai XL, A V-shaped association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and poor outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol. 2024;400:131773. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131773
- 23.↵Zakai NA, Minnier J, Safford MM, Race-Dependent Association of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels With Incident Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(22):2104-2115. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.09.027
- 24.↵Ayyobi AF, McGladdery SH, Chan S, John Mancini GB, Hill JS, Frohlich JJ. Lecithin: cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) deficiency and risk of vascular disease: 25 year follow-up. Atherosclerosis. 2004;177(2):361-366. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.07.018
- 25.↵Pirillo A, Norata GD, Catapano AL. High-density lipoprotein subfractions--what the clinicians need to know. Cardiology. 2013;124(2):116-125. doi:10.1159/000346463
- 26.González-Pacheco H, Amezcua-Guerra LM, Vazquez-Rangel A, Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol are Associated With Biomarkers of Inflammation in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(11):1651-1657. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.009
- 27.Kontush A, Chapman MJ. Antiatherogenic function of HDL particle subpopulations: focus on antioxidative activities. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2010;21(4):312-318. doi:10.1097/MOL.0b013e32833bcdc1
- 28.↵Mazidi M, Mikhailidis DP, Banach M. Associations between risk of overall mortality, cause-specific mortality and level of inflammatory factors with extremely low and high high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels among American adults. Int J Cardiol. 2019;276:242-247. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.095
- 29.↵Couillard C, Després JP, Lamarche B, Effects of endurance exercise training on plasma HDL cholesterol levels depend on levels of triglycerides: evidence from men of the Health, Risk Factors, Exercise Training and Genetics (HERITAGE) Family Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21(7):1226-1232. doi:10.1161/hq0701.092137
- 30.↵Kodama S, Tanaka S, Saito K, Effect of aerobic exercise training on serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(10):999-1008. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.10.999
- 31.↵Ruiz-Ramie JJ, Barber JL, Sarzynski MA. Effects of exercise on HDL functionality. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2019;30(1):16-23. doi:10.1097/MOL.0000000000000568
- 32.↵De Oliveira E Silva ER, Foster D, McGee Harper M, Alcohol consumption raises HDL cholesterol levels by increasing the transport rate of apolipoproteins A-I and A-II. Circulation. 2000;102(19):2347-2352. doi:10.1161/01.cir.102.19.2347
- 33.↵Clofibrate and niacin in coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1975;231(4):360-381.
- 34.↵AIM-HIGH Investigators, Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 12;367(2):189]. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(24):2255-2267. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1107579
- 35.↵McTaggart F, Jones P. Effects of statins on high-density lipoproteins: a potential contribution to cardiovascular benefit. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2008;22(4):321-338. doi:10.1007/s10557-008-6113-z
- 36.↵Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(2):152-160. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00530-7
- 37.↵Barter PJ, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Palmer MK, Nicholls SJ. Effect of statins on HDL-C: a complex process unrelated to changes in LDL-C: analysis of the VOYAGER Database. J Lipid Res. 2010;51(6):1546-1553. doi:10.1194/jlr.P002816
- 38.↵Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Abt M, Effects of dalcetrapib in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(22):2089-2099. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1206797
- 39.↵Lincoff AM, Nicholls SJ, Riesmeyer JS, Evacetrapib and Cardiovascular Outcomes in High-Risk Vascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(20):1933-1942. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1609581
- 40.↵HPS3/TIMI55–REVEAL Collaborative Group, Bowman L, Hopewell JC, Effects of Anacetrapib in Patients with Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1217-1227. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706444
- 41.↵Gibson CM, Duffy D, Korjian S, Apolipoprotein A1 Infusions and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(17):1560-1571. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2400969
- 42.↵Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Miller M, Lipoprotein(a) Blood Levels and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction With Icosapent Ethyl. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(16):1529-1539. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.016


