Atypical Glandular Cells in Cervical Smear During Pregnancy and Postpartum Period

  • Clinical Medicine & Research
  • February 2005,
  • 3
  • (1)
  • 1-
  • 2;
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.3.1.1

The 2001 Bethesda System defines atypical glandular cells (AGC) as glandular cell abnormalities that are distinct from adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma in situ.1 Before 2001, a spectrum of glandular cell abnormalities in cervical smears was grouped under atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) and defined as glandular cells exhibiting changes beyond reactive or reparative changes, but lacking unequivocal features of invasive adenocarcinoma.2 The incidence and clinical significance of AGUS have been extensively reported, 36 however, studies reporting AGUS smears in pregnancy and postpartum period are very limited.

Chhieng and colleagues7 have reported the largest number of AGUS smears in pregnancy and postpartum period (n=35). Among the 13,361 smears performed during the 3-year study period, this group reported a 0.26% incidence rate with a mean patient age of 29. Of the 35 patients with AGUS smears, 8 patients were lost to follow up, 17 were referred for colposcopy and biopsy, and 10 had repeated smears. For those who underwent colposcopy and biopsy, five patients had histologically proven cervical intraepithelial lesions. The others had benign pathologies including squamous cell metaplasia, endocervical or endometrial polyps, Arias-Stella reactions and microglandular hyperplasia. Two of the 10 patients had persistent abnormalities on repeated smears but their outcomes were not reported. The authors reported the incidence of significant pathology in this study as 29%. However, the incidence rate of significant pathology was calculated on the basis of the 17 cases referred for colposcopy and biopsy only, and did not include the patients being followed with repeated smears which would reduce the rate of significant pathology to less than 20%.

Two other studies have been reported on pregnancy related AGUS, although these involved smaller numbers of patients. Michael and colleagues8 reported 26 cases of AGUS during pregnancy or postpartum period, most of which were followed with repeated cervical smears after 3 to 6 months. Biopsies were performed in the postpartum period only if atypia persisted on repeat smears. Eight patients had colposcopy directed biopsies and only 2 patients were diagnosed with squamous cell intraepithelial lesions. Kim and colleagues9 reported a large study of 326 patients: 21 were diagnosed with AGUS during pregnancy or within 8 weeks postpartum. Only one of the 21 patients had significant pathology showing carcinoma in situ, though the method of follow-up was not specified. From the studies described above, the incidence of significant pathology following an abnormal glandular cytology on cervical smear during pregnancy or postpartum period was not as high as has been demonstrated in the non-pregnant population (31% to 48%).4,10,11

The observed lower incidence could be explained by 1) over-diagnosis of AGUS during pregnancy and postpartum period, and 2) younger age in patients having pregnancy-related AGUS smears. A number of reports have emphasized pregnancy-related cellular changes and their diagnostic pitfalls.1317 Decidual cells, trophoblasts, and Arias-Stella reactions frequently cause confusion in the interpretation of cervical smears of pregnant patients. Distinguishing between Arias-Stella cells and cells of glandular abnormalities can be difficult because the morphologic characterization of the former is poor.17 It is therefore essential for the pathologists evaluating the smear to know the pregnancy status of the patient. Misdiagnosis could be minimized by the awareness of the physiological changes associated with pregnancy. The mean age of patients having AGUS during pregnancy or postpartum period was only available in one of the papers discussed above. The mean age of these patients was much lower (mean age=27) than in non-pregnant populations (ages 44 to 50),6,9,10,12 and could partially explain the lower incidence of significant pathology in pregnancy-related AGUS as the risk of malignancy is lower in younger women.

From the very limited evidence currently available, no clear guidelines for the management of atypical glandular cells detected in cervical smears during pregnancy or postpartum period can be developed. Sub-classification of atypical glandular cells into favor neoplasia or not otherwise specified as required in the 2001 Bethesda System would help the colposcopists in making clinical diagnoses.1 Communication between pathologists and colposcopists is fundamental. Colposcopy during pregnancy is a safe procedure and colposcopy directed biopsy, in experienced hands, helps exclude significant cervical pathologies for selected cases. If malignancy is not evident from initial colposcopic evaluation, follow-up colposcopic and cytologic surveillance are acceptable methods for management during pregnancy. However, endocervical sampling is not advisable during pregnancy. Cone biopsy during pregnancy increases the risk of pre-term, pre-labor rupture of membranes and should only be performed if malignancy is highly suspicious.18 After 8 weeks postpartum, invasive investigation can safely be performed and patients should be managed according to the 2001 Bethesda consensus guidelines.1

References

  1. 1
    Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ; ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA 2002;287:2120–2129.
  2. 2
    Kennedy AW, Salmieri SS, Wirth SL, Biscotti CV, Tuason LJ, Travarca MJ. Results of the clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGCUS) detected on cervical cytology screening. Gynecol Oncol 1996;63:14–18.
  3. 3
    Chhieng DC, Elgert PA, Cangiarella JF, Cohen JM. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. A follow-up study from an academic medical center. Acta Cytol 2000;44:557–566.
  4. 4
    Cheng RF, Hernandez E, Anderson LL, Heller PB, Shank R. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. J Reprod Med 1999;44:922–928.
  5. 5
    Raab SS, Isacson C, Layfield LJ, Lenel JC, Slagel DD, Thomas PA. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Cytologic criteria to separate clinically significant from benign lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:574–582.
  6. 6
    Zweizig S, Noller K, Reale F, Collis S, Resseguie L. Neoplasia associated with atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical cytology. Gynecol Oncol 1997;65:314–318.
  7. 7
    Chhieng DC, Elgert P, Cangiarella JF, Cohen JM. Significance of AGUS Pap smears in pregnant and postpartum women. Acta Cytol 2001;45:294–299.
  8. 8
    Michael CW, Esfahani FM. Pregnancy-related changes: a retrospective review of 278 cervical smears. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:99–107.
  9. 9
    Kim TJ, Kim HS, Park CT, Park IS, Hong SR, Park JS, Shim JU. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears. Gynecol Oncol 1999;73:292–298.
  10. 10
    Tam KF, Cheung AN, Liu KL, Ng TY, Pun TC, Chan YM, Wong LC, Ng AW, Ngan HY. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:603–607.
  11. 11
    Hammoud MM, Haefner HK, Michael CW, Ansbacher R. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Histologic findings and proposed management. J Reprod Med 2002;47:266–270.
  12. 12
    Ha SY, Cho HI, Oh YH, Lee JM, Suh KS. Cytologic and histologic correlation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. J Korean Med Sci 2001;16:214–219.
  13. 13
    Frank TS, Bhat N, Noumoff JS, Yeh IT. Residual trophoblastic tissue as a source of highly atypical cells in the postpartum cervicovaginal smear. Acta Cytol 1991;35:105–108.
  14. 14
    Murad TM, Terhart K, Flint A. Atypical cells in pregnancy and postpartum smears. Acta Cytol 1981;25:623–630.
  15. 15
    Rhatigan RM. Endocervical gland atypia secondary to Arias-Stella change. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:943–946.
  16. 16
    Pisharodi LR, Jovanoska S. Spectrum of cytologic changes in pregnancy. A review of 100 abnormal cervicovaginal smears, with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1995;39:905–908.
  17. 17
    Kobayashi TK, Okamoto H. Cytopathology of pregnancy-induced cell patterns in cervicovaginal smears. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114 Suppl:S6–S20.
  18. 18
    Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2004;291:2100–2106.
Loading
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Article Alerts
  • Email Article
  • Citation Tools
  • Share
  • Bookmark this Article