Distribution of the HTT Gene A1 and A2 Haplotypes Worldwide: A Systematic Review

  • December 2020,
  • 145;
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2020.1523

Abstract

Background: Huntington’s disease (HD)(MIM:143100) is an severe autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by the dynamic expansion of CAG trinucleotides (> 35) in the HTT gene [Genomic Coordinates- (GRCh38):4:3,074,680-3,243,959].

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the reported associations between the frequencies of the A1 and A2 haplotypes in HD-affected and non-affected populations from different countries on different continents, in order to demonstrate the overall profile of these haplotypes worldwide, pointing towards the most frequent haplotypes that could be useful for HTT mutant-specific allele silencing in different populations.

Methods: Publications in MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase from the last 10 years (PROSPERO CRD42018115282) were assessed.

Results: A total of 20 articles from 113 were selected for evaluation in their entirety, and eight were eligible for this study.

Conclusion: Regardless of the size of the CAG tract, the articles included in this review demonstrate that populations with high HD prevalence present higher frequencies of the A1 or A2 haplotypes than populations exhibiting low HD prevalence, even when similar average CAG numbers are noted. Based on the presented articles, we suggest that the haplotypic profile is more closely related to the ancestral origin than to the size of the CAG tract. The identification of populations presenting a higher frequency of high-risk genotypes can contribute to more accurate genetic counseling, in addition to providing knowledge on HD epidemiology. According to the continued progress in the development of specific genetic silencing therapies by different research groups and pharmaceutical companies, such as haplotype targeting strategies for allele-specific HTT suppression, we conclude that the definition of haplotypes in phase with CAG expansions will contribute to the design of gene-silencing drugs specific for different populations worldwide.

Keywords:

Huntington’s disease (HD) (MIM:143100) is a severe, progressive autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor, cognitive and behavioral disorders. The cause of this disease is the dynamic expansion of CAG trinucleotides beyond their normal threshold (> 35 CAG repeats) within the HTT gene on chromosome 4 (4p16.3) [Genomic Coordinates-(GRCh38):4:3,074,680-3,243,959]. As a result of the expansion of CAG trinucleotide repeats, the Huntington protein encoded by this gene is expressed with a longer-than-normal polyglutamine tail, which is associated with neuronal death,1-3 although other pathogenic mechanisms have also been suggested.4-8

Normal alleles exhibit fewer than 27 CAG repeats.9 Alleles with 27 to 35 replicates are classified as intermediate alleles (IAs), which usually lead to a normal phenotype but are genetically unstable during DNA replication and, therefore, may generate de novo HD mutations.9 Alleles consisting of 36 to 39 CAG units exhibit reduced penetrance and may or may not cause HD symptoms.9 Alleles with over 40 CAG repeats show complete penetrance and will cause the HD phenotype.9

HD symptoms begin between 40-50 years of age in most cases, but juvenile cases in which the symptoms of the disease appear before the age of 20 have been reported. Patients with HD survive for 15 to 20 years after the age of onset of the first symptoms.10

According to Harper,11 the founding effect of the HD mutation occurred in Europe and subsequently spread to other continents, and the prevalence of HD varies according to ancestral origin.11 In Eastern and Central Europe, prevalence was reported as 5.16 per 100,000 in 2010;12 in the UK, 12.3 per 100,000;13 and in Italy, 10.85 per 100,000.14 In three studies conducted in Asia, the mean prevalence was estimated at only 0.40/100,000 individuals,15 while in Africa HD prevalence ranges from 1-3.56/100,000, depending on ancestry.12

The instability of CAG trinucleotides across generations can be influenced by the sex or age of the allele carrier, the size of the CAG alleles, environmental factors, and trans- and cis-factors. Genetic variants such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the HTT gene have been described as the main interfering elements,16-21 although, this interference has been contested by.22

A haplotype (haploid genotype) is a group of alleles in linkage disequilibrium inherited from a single parent; ie, alleles that tend to always occur together and are therefore statistically associated. A HTT haplogroup is a cluster of similar haplotypes, such as haplogroup A (variants A1-A5), B (variants B1a, B1b and B2) and C (C1-C8). Specific sets of SNPs have been investigated in different HD populations for categorization into specific haplogroups.

Different categories of HTT gene haplotypes have been assessed by Warby et al,20,23 Pulkes et al,24 Baine et al,25 Kay et al,26 and Lee et al.27 References 20 and 25-27 provide figures showing sets of SNPs of different haplotypes that define HTT haplogroups.

The investigation of haplotypes in a population is paramount, since HD prevalence and incidence are related to haplotypes that are observed more frequently in the normal population.20,23 The identification of populations presenting a higher frequency of A1-A2 genotypes for HD can contribute to more accurate genetic counseling, in addition to providing knowledge about HD prevalence. Furthermore, it allows public health policies to be followed and may aid in the design of specific genetic silencing therapies, representing an allele-specific treatment strategy for these patients.

The goal of this systematic literature review is to investigate the association of the frequencies of the A1 and A2 haplotypes in HD-affected and non-affected populations from different countries on different continents to reveal the overall profile of these haplotypes worldwide. A review of genotypes (haplotypes and haplogroups in conjunction with HTT CAG expansions) will add important information to support future HTT mutant-specific allele silencing in different populations worldwide.

Methods

Protocol Registry

We registered the study protocol at the PROSPERO database (http://www.prisma-statement.org/Protocols/Registration), under registration number CRD42018115282. We also followed the PRISMA statement recommendations in writing this systematic review.28

Search Strategy and Search Sources

The research question was structured based on the PICO strategy:

  • P (Population): Normal population (non-HD individuals) and affected HD population

  • I (Intervention): Presence of A1 and A2 haplotypes in HD affected and non-affected populations in different countries

  • C (Comparison): Not applicable

  • O (Outcomes): Describe the frequency of individuals with A1 and A2 haplotypes in HD affected and non-affected populations in different countries

Eligibility Criteria

  • Observational epidemiological studies investigating the frequencies of A1 and A2 haplotypes in normal individuals (individuals not suffering from HD) and in the affected population

  • Articles published in the last 10 years (2008-2018)

  • Studies in humans

  • Studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria

  • Studies that investigated individuals without categorizing the frequencies of affected and non-affected individuals

  • Studies conducted only in HD families

  • Studies that did not determine the A1 and A2 haplotypes

  • Narrative literature reviews, case reports or case series

Search Sources and the Research Strategy

MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase were used as the search databases. Additional records were searched in bibliographic references following the same selection and/or exclusion criteria.

PubMed

(“Huntington Disease”[Mesh] OR “Huntington Chorea” OR “Chorea, Huntington” OR “Huntington’s Disease” OR “Chronic Progressive Hereditary Chorea (Huntington)” OR “Huntington Chronic Progressive Hereditary Chorea” OR “Progressive Chorea, Chronic Hereditary (Huntington) “ OR “Progressive Chorea, Hereditary, Chronic (Huntington) “ OR “Huntington’s Chorea” OR “Chorea, Huntington’s” OR “Chorea, Chronic Progressive Hereditary (Huntington) “ OR “Huntington Disease, Late Onset” OR “Late-Onset Huntington Disease” OR “Huntington Disease, Late-Onset” OR “Late Onset Huntington Disease” OR “Juvenile Huntington Disease” OR “Juvenile-Onset Huntington Disease” OR “Juvenile Onset Huntington Disease” OR “Huntington Disease, Juvenile-Onset” OR “Huntington Disease, Juvenile Onset” OR “Huntington Disease, Juvenile” OR “Akinetic-Rigid Variant of Huntington Disease” OR “Akinetic Rigid Variant of Huntington Disease” OR “Huntington Disease, Akinetic-Rigid Variant” OR “Huntington Disease, Akinetic Rigid Variant”)) AND (“Haplotypes”[Mesh] OR “Haplotype” OR “A1” OR “A2” OR “Haplogroup”)

Embase

‘huntington disease’/exp AND ‘haplotype’/exp AND[embase]/lim NOT [medline]/lim AND [2008-2018]/py

Study Selection and Data Collection Process

First, a title analysis of the articles was carried out according to the objective of this review, and articles of interest were included in a second round of analysis through an abstract selection. Articles were then selected for the third stage based on the relevant abstracts, in which the full texts were analyzed for the final selection. Articles that appeared in more than one database were considered only once.

Article selection was performed by two independent reviewers who extracted data such as the authors, year of publication, number of chromosomes and individuals (affected and non-affected by HD), average numbers of CAG repeats and A1 and A2 haplotype frequencies (%) in affected and unaffected individuals.

A critical evaluation of the possible biases of the chosen articles was carried out by both independent reviewers based on the main types of bias that can be found in observational studies. These biases were classified into the following categories: selection, information and confounding bias. In the event of non-agreement, the final decision was made by a third reviewer who performed an independent selection.

Results

A total of 116 titles were found, 78 in PubMed, 35 in Embase and three obtained through searching lists of bibliographical references. Among the 116 titles, three had been published in more than one database, and their duplicates were withdrawn, resulting in 113 articles. After applying the exclusion criteria, 20 articles were selected for evaluation in their entirety, eight of which were considered eligible and included in this systematic review. The flowchart of the study selection process is displayed in Figure 1 and data from the studies included in this review are displayed in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Article selection algorithm

View this table:
Table 1.

Articles which met the inclusion criteria

A total of 7,904 normal chromosomes (<35 CAG repeats in HTT) and 5,018 expanded chromosomes (> 39 CAG) were analyzed among the eight studies included in this review.

The average size of the CAG tract in normal chromosomes for HD individuals ranged from 16.4924 to 2620 repeats, while the mean value of expanded CAG repeats varied from 43.524 to 46.1925 in mutated HTT.

Among the studies included in this review, 37.5% (n=3) involved European populations; 37.5% (n=3) involved Canadian populations; 25% (n=2) involved Asian populations; 12.5% (n=1) involved South African populations; and 12.5% (n=1) involved Latin American populations. Two studies analyzed populations from different continents.23,26

In two studies, the authors stratified allele types into normal, intermediate, reduced penetrance and complete penetrance alleles.20,29 The other studies categorized the alleles into normal (without full penetrance) and affected (with full penetrance).

One study involving populations from European countries demonstrated that recombination between haplotypes A1 and A2 rarely occurs within the transcribed HTT gene sequence. Only 9/283 (3.2%) expanded chromosomes, and 25/829 (3%) control chromosomes presented intragenic haplotype recombination.26

A1 and A2 frequencies in individuals not affected by HD, who exhibited only normal alleles, were of 0% in the Asian (Thailand),24 African (South African),25 and Amerindian populations (Peru);31 on the other hand, the frequency of both A1 and A2 haplotypes was 61.2% in Canadians of European descent.29 In two studies involving normal Canadian individuals of European origin from the general population, A1 and A2 frequencies in the intermediate alleles were 72.4%29 and 83%,20 respectively. In individuals affected by HD, however, this frequency ranged from 0% in Africans (South African)25 and Asians (Thai)24 to 95% in Canadians of European descent.20

The highest A1 and A2 haplotype frequencies in individuals not affected by HD (both in normal and IAs) and HD carriers were observed in populations of European origin.20,29

Two studies, one conducted in South Africa25 and the other in Latin America (Peru),31 segmented participants by ancestral origin. In the South Africa study, the authors investigated Caucasians, mestizos and black people25, while the Latin America (Peru) study assessed mestizo and Amerindian individuals.31 In the Caucasian population of the South Africa study, variants A1 and A2 were associated with HD alleles (CAG > 35), and in the admixed population, similarly to the Caucasian results, variants A1 and A2 were associated with HD alleles. Concerning the alleles of the two non-HD subpopulations (Caucasian and admixed), A1 haplogroups were associated with larger CAG repeats (26-30 in Caucasians and 21-25 in the mixed population).25

In the Latin America study (mestizo Peruvians), the expanded mutation probably originated in individuals with the native Amerindian A1 haplotype in most of the chromosomes (73%) of affected admixed individuals and those of Amerindian origin.31 Thus, most of the HD-associated mutations in Latin America may occur on chromosomes with Amerindian descent haplotypes rather than haplotypes resulting from miscegenation with European individuals.31

It is worth mentioning that Chao et al,30 using the numerical HTT haplotyping system developed at Harvard, included a brief comparison of the two haplotype systems (eg, letters or numbers) and demonstrated that the letter and number haplotyping systems do not map 1:1.30 However, despite categorizing haplogroups with the Hap nomenclature,23 one study was included in this review because the authors compared and integrated the Hap haplotype system with the haplotypes A1 and A2.30 Thus, the article did not meet any of the exclusion criteria of this review.

Discussion

The HD A1-A2 haplotypes can be found in the general European population and are commonly associated with longer CAG expansions present in IAs and in normal alleles with 17-20 CAG repeats.20 Therefore, it has been suggested that de novo HD mutations originate in a step-by-step manner, giving rise to new HD cases , after which expansions arise via a step-by-step mechanism in which large normal alleles can generate IAs during intergenerational transmission, which are then responsible for further generating de novo HD mutations.20

Some authors have noted that the A1 and A2 haplotypes are associated not only with HD carriers but also with other normal formats with larger CAG expansions by chance.22,27 It has, therefore, been suggested that haplotypes do not influence predisposition to CAG trinucleotide expansion and that the major influencing factor is the size of the CAG tract itself, as observed in a sperm analysis performed by Semaka et al29 which indicated instability differences due to CAG tract length in IAs.

Targeting SNPs of both the A1 and A2 haplotypes is essential to achieve treatment of most HD patients in populations in which HD is most prevalent. The most common HD haplotypes (A1, A2, and A3a) define mutually exclusive sets of polymorphisms for allele-specific therapy in the greatest number of patients. Therefore, a maximum of 80% patients from Canada, Sweden, France, and Italy may be treatable by targeting these three haplotypes.26 The preclinical development of potent, selective antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) targeting SNPs of the A2 HTT haplotype has been proposed as an allele-specific treatment strategy for the disease.26 In the past, it was believed that new HD mutations were very rare events and that the disease was restricted to families with a history of HD. However, it is now known that de novo expansions of CAG are more frequent than expected and that sporadic cases of HD correspond to 10% or more of total reported cases.11,32,33

Differences in HD prevalence rates within populations are closely linked to individual haplotypes, CAG trinucleotide sizes, IA frequency and the rate of new HD mutations.34 The prevalence of HD is usually lower in populations in which A1-A2 haplotypes are rare.23,24 This situation is noted in the results of the studies included in this review.20,24,25,29,30 In the present study, the prevalence of A1-A2 haplotypes in Asian and African continent populations was found to be considerably lower than in European continent populations.23,24,25 In Asia (Thailand),24 these haplotypes were shown to be absent in the affected population and present in only 0.2-1.4% of the general population.24 On the other hand, the highest frequency of A1 and A2 haplotypes in Canada, which is known to exhibit a high prevalence of HD, was found in the general population (up to 61.2% in normal alleles), and a frequency of up to 95% was found in expanded alleles.23,28,29 Rawlins et al12 reported an increase in the prevalence of HD in Europe over the last 50 years, in a systematic review, leading the authors to conclude that one of the causes of this increase was an increase in the mutation rate of the HTT gene, with a corresponding increase in HD incidence. Interestingly, HD incidence in the UK remained unchanged between 1990 and 2010.35

CAG tract transmission instability was investigated in patients with HD and the normal Finnish population.36 The authors concluded that the low frequency of HD in Finland was partly explained by the relatively lower frequency of the haplogroup A in the general population. Furthermore, notable differences in the instability of intergenerational CAG repeats depending on parental haplotype and sex were noted. CAG repeats in haplogroup A increased by 3.18 CAG units in paternal transmissions but only by 0.11 units in maternal transmissions (P=0.008), while haplogroup C repetition length decreased in both paternal and maternal transmissions.36 The frequency of A1-A2 haplotypes is null in HD-affected and unaffected black South African individuals.25 Baine et al25 reported that the most frequent haplotype in the African population is B2. This finding is correlated with the prevalence of HD in African ethnic groups, since previous reports indicate that the prevalence of HD is higher in Caucasians (22 per 1,000,000) than in blacks (0.1 per 1,000,000) on this continent.37

Concerning HD prevalence in Latin America, a large cluster of HD is noted in Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela.18 The overall prevalence of the disease is still unknown in Brazil, a country of continental dimensions. However, the minimum prevalence has been determined in some localities, such as Ervália-MG (7.2 per 10,000 inhabitants),38 Feira Grande-AL (1 per 1000 inhabitants),39 three regions in the state of Ceará (with prevalences of 12 per 370 inhabitants, 1 per 83,750 inhabitants and 1 per 1740 inhabitants),40 and the state of Rio Grande do Sul (1.85 per 100,000 inhabitants).41 In this systematic review, the only included study investigating the Peruvian population (Latin America) indicates that, in addition to haplotypes of European origin, the population presents a subtype of the A1 haplotype, the Amerindian A1 haplotype.31 Evidence suggests that HD originated from a mixture of founding populations from Europe and indigenous populations in Latin America.31

As stated previously, the A1 and A2 haplotypes are usually related to larger CAG expansions.20 Among normal chromosomes, 53% of normal alleles (mean of 19 CAGs) belong to these haplotypes in the Canadian population.20 Two studies evaluating populations of Asian origin23,24 and one assessing an African population25 observed average numbers of CAG replicates that are considered low [mean 16.49 in Thailand and 16.91 in South Africa (Blacks)]. In addition, the A1 and A2 haplotype frequencies were also low in the following populations: Thailand24 0.2% A1 and 1.4% A2 and South Africa25 (Blacks) 0% A1 and A2.

Among HD-affected individuals, the correlation between the mean CAG numbers and the A1 and A2 haplotypes differs according to the ethnic origin of the participants. It is noteworthy that in one study, individuals from certain European and Asian countries showed similar average CAG numbers (45 and 45.1, respectively),23 whereas the A1 and A2 haplotypes were found in 50% and 29% of European chromosomes, respectively, and were absent in chromosomes from the Asian population.23 A similar result was observed by Baine et al,25 where South African Caucasian and black populations showed average numbers of CAG repeats of 44.77 and 44.51, respectively. Table 1 indicates that the A1 and A2 haplotypes were present at higher frequencies in populations of European origin.20,23,25,26,29,30 On the other hand, no A1 or A2 haplotypes were found in the black population of East Asia23 or the black population of South Africa.25

The fact that a higher number of studies (37.5%) has been conducted in Europe may suggest a bias in indicating higher A1 and A2 frequencies on the European continent compared to other continents. Notably, very few studies involving African (n=1), Asian (n=2) and Latin American (n=1) populations met the inclusion criteria of this review. It is important to mention that the low prevalence of HD in Asia, Africa and Latin America could also be influenced by underestimation. For example, mental health and mental health care have not become a high priority in most Asian countries,42 despite the recent emphasis placed on mental health at the international level. However, Kay et al31 demonstrated that the frequency of IAs in the healthy general population was the highest in Hispanic Americans and Northern Europeans and the lowest in Black Africans and East Asians. The prevalence of HD correlates with the IA frequency by population and with the proportion of IAs found in the HD-associated A1 haplotype.

Conclusion

The frequencies of A1 and A2 haplotypes are higher in populations of European origin in both HD and non-HD groups than in South Africa and Asia, according to the articles included in this review. Haplotype investigation in a population is paramount, as HD prevalence and incidence are related to haplotypes observed more frequently in the population The articles included in this review demonstrate that populations with a high HD prevalence exhibit higher frequencies of the A1 or A2 haplotypes than populations displaying low HD prevalence, even when the populations exhibit similar average CAG numbers.

Based on the articles presented in Table 1, we suggest that the haplotypic profile is more closely related to ancestral origin than to the size of the CAG tract. Identifying populations presenting a higher frequency of high-risk genotypes for HD can contribute to more accurate genetic counseling, while also providing knowledge on HD epidemiology.

According to continued progress20 in the development of specific genetic silencing therapies by different groups and pharmaceutical companies, such as haplotype-targeting strategies for allele-specific HTT suppression, we can conclude that the definition of the haplotypes in phase with HTT mutants will contribute to the design of gene-silencing drugs that are specific for different populations worldwide. It will be a great scientific achievement if a new specific drug (or drugs) that slows, halts, or even reverses HD symptoms reaches the market within 10 years. According to Kay et al,43 HD is the most common genetic condition to be addressed with antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs). Targeting a transcript (with A1 or A2 haplotypes in phase with expanded HTT) with ASOs would selectively mark the expanded transcript for degradation.

Footnotes

  • Financial Disclosures: The authors received financial support for this project from FAPERJ, and a scholarship from CAPES was awarded to T.A. Apolinário for support during her PhD studies.

  • Authors who contributed equally to this work

  • Received August 13, 2019.
  • Revision received February 15, 2020.
  • Revision received May 31, 2020.
  • Accepted August 4, 2020.

References

  1. 1.
    Gusella JF, Wexler NS, Conneally PM, A polymorphic DNA marker genetically linked to Huntington’s disease. Nature. 1983;306(5940):234-238.
  2. 2.
    Gusella JF, MacDonald ME. Trinucleotide instability: a repeating theme in human inherited disorders. Annu Rev Med. 1996;47:201-209.
  3. 3.
    A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. The Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell. 1993;72(6):971-983.
  4. 4.
    Nalavade R, Griesche N, Ryan DP, Hildebrand S, Krauss S. Mechanisms of RNA-induced toxicity in CAG repeat disorders. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4(8):e752.
  5. 5.
    Martí E. RNA toxicity induced by expanded CAG repeats in Huntington’s disease. Brain Pathol. 2016;26(6):779-786.
  6. 6.
    Vuono R, Winder-Rhodes S, de Silva R, The role of tau in the pathological process and clinical expression of Huntington’s disease. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 7):1907-1918.
  7. 7.
    Bassi S, Tripathi T, Monziani A, Di Leva F, Biagioli M. Epigenetics of Huntington’s Disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;978:277-299.
  8. 8.
    Genetic Modifiers of Huntington’s Disease (GeM-HD) Consortium. Identification of genetic factors that modify clinical onset of Huntington’s Disease. Cell. 2015;162(3):516-526.
  9. 9.
    ACMG/ASHG statement. Laboratory guidelines for Huntington disease genetic testing. The American College of Medical Genetics/American Society of Human Genetics Huntington Disease Genetic Testing Working Group. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(5):1243-1247.
  10. 10.
    Andrew SE, Paul Goldberg Y, Kremer B, The relationship between trinucleotide (CAG) repeat length and clinical features of Huntington’s disease. Nat Genet. 1993;4(4):398-403.
  11. 11.
    Harper PS. The epidemiology of Huntington’s disease. Hum Genet. 1992;89(4):365-376.
  12. 12.
    Rawlins MD, Wexler NS, Wexler AR, The Prevalence of Huntington’s Disease. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;46(2):144-153.
  13. 13.
    Evans SJW, Douglas I, Rawlins MD, Wexler NS, Tabrizi SJ, Smeeth L. Prevalence of adult Huntington’s disease in the UK based on diagnoses recorded in general practice records. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(10):1156-1160.
  14. 14.
    Squitieri F, Griguoli A, Capelli G, Porcellini A, D’Alessio B. Epidemiology of Huntington disease: first post-HTT gene analysis of prevalence in Italy. Clin Genet. 2016;89(3):367-370.
  15. 15.
    Pringsheim T, Wiltshire K, Day L, Dykeman J, Steeves T, Jette N. The incidence and prevalence of Huntington’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2012;27(9):1083-1091.
  16. 16.
    Richards RI. Dynamic mutations: a decade of unstable expanded repeats in human genetic disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(20):2187-2194.
  17. 17.
    Rolfsmeier ML, Dixon MJ, Pessoa-Brandão L, Pelletier R, Miret JJ, Lahue RS. Cis-elements governing trinucleotide repeat instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2001;157(4):1569-1579.
  18. 18.
    Wexler NS, Lorimer J, Porter J, Venezuelan kindreds reveal that genetic and environmental factors modulate Huntington’s disease age of onset. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(10):3498-3503.
  19. 19.
    Nguyen GH, Bouchard J, Boselli MG, DNA stability and schizophrenia in twins. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2003;120B(1):1-10.
  20. 20.
    Warby SC, Montpetit A, Hayden AR, CAG expansion in the Huntington disease gene is associated with a specific and targetable predisposing haplogroup. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(3):351-366.
  21. 21.
    Squitieri F, Andrew SE, Goldberg YP, DNA haplotype analysis of Huntington disease reveals clues to the origins and mechanisms of CAG expansion and reasons for geographic variations of prevalence. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3(12):2103-2114.
  22. 22.
    Falush D. Haplotype background, repeat length evolution, and Huntington’s disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85(6):939-942.
  23. 23.
    Warby SC, Visscher H, Collins JA, HTT haplotypes contribute to differences in Huntington disease prevalence between Europe and East Asia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(5):561-566.
  24. 24.
    Pulkes T, Papsing C, Wattanapokayakit S, Mahasirimongkol S. Cag-expansion haplotype analysis in a population with a low prevalence of Huntington’s Disease. J Clin Neurol. 2014;10(1):32-36.
  25. 25.
    Baine FK, Kay C, Ketelaar ME, Huntington disease in the South African population occurs on diverse and ethnically distinct genetic haplotypes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(10):1120-1127.
  26. 26.
    Kay C, Collins JA, Skotte NH, Huntingtin haplotypes provide prioritized target panels for allele-specific silencing in Huntington Disease patients of European ancestry. Mol Ther. 2015;23(11):1759-1771.
  27. 27.
    Lee JM, Gillis T, Mysore JS, Common SNP-based haplotype analysis of the 4p16.3 Huntington disease gene region. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(3):434-444.
  28. 28.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
  29. 29.
    Semaka A, Kay C, Doty CN, Collins JA, Tam N, Hayden MR. High frequency of intermediate alleles on Huntington disease-associated haplotypes in British Columbia’s general population. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2013;162B(8):864-871.
  30. 30.
    Chao MJ, Gillis T, Atwal RS, Haplotype-based stratification of Huntington’s disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25(11):1202-1209.
  31. 31.
    Kay C, Tirado-Hurtado I, Cornejo-Olivas M, The targetable A1 Huntington disease haplotype has distinct Amerindian and European origins in Latin America. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25(3):332-340.
  32. 32.
    Conneally PM. Huntington disease: genetics and epidemiology. Am J Hum Genet. 1984;36(3):506-526.
  33. 33.
    Falush D, Almqvist EW, Brinkmann RR, Iwasa Y, Hayden MR. Measurement of mutational flow implies both a high new-mutation rate for Huntington disease and substantial underascertainment of late-onset cases. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68(2):37485.
  34. 34.
    Kay C, Collins JA, Wright GEB, The molecular epidemiology of Huntington disease is related to intermediate allele frequency and haplotype in the general population. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2018;177(3):346-357.
  35. 35.
    Wexler NS, Collett L, Wexler AR, Incidence of adult Huntington’s disease in the UK: a UK-based primary care study and a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e009070.
  36. 36.
    Ylönen S, Sipilä JOT, Hietala M, Majamaa K. HTT haplogroups in Finnish patients with Huntington disease. Neurol Genet. 2019;5(3):e334.
  37. 37.
    Hayden MR, MacGregor JM, Beighton PH. The prevalence of Huntington’s chorea in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 1980;58(5):193-196.
  38. 38.
    Agostinho Lde A, da Silva Idos S, Maia LA, A Study of a Geographical Cluster of Huntington’s Disease in a Brazilian Town of Zona da Mata, Minas Gerais State. Eur Neurol. 2015;74(1-2):62-68.
  39. 39.
    Alencar MA, Lopez AM, Figueiredo E, E05 Prevalence of Huntington’s disease in Feira Grande, a small city in Northeastern Brazil [abstract]. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2010;81:A22.
  40. 40.
    Cavalcante Filho JRM, Furtado L. Epidemiology of Huntington’s disease in Ceará [abstract]. First Latin American meeting on Huntington’s Disease; July 7-8, 2018; Barranquilla-Colombia.
  41. 41.
    Castilhos RM, Santos JAD, Augustin MC, Minimal prevalence of Huntington’s disease in the South of Brazil and instability of the expanded CAG tract during intergenerational transmissions. Genet Mol Biol. 2019;42(2):329-336.
  42. 42.
    Meshvara D. Mental health and mental health care in Asia. World Psychiatry. 2002;1(2):118-120.
  43. 43.
    Kay C, Collins JA, Caron NS, A comprehensive haplotype-targeting strategy for allele-specific HTT suppression in Huntington disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105(6):1112-1125.
Loading