HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: cmr.2009.856v1 7/4/127    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Durso, S. C. Articles by Wright, S. M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Durso, S. C. Articles by Wright, S. M.

Implications of Academic Medicine’s Failure to Recognize Clinical Excellence

Samuel C. Durso, MD, MBA^*, Colleen Christmas, MD^*, Steven J. Kravet, MD, MBA, Gregory Parsons and Scott M. Wright, MD

^* Divisions of Geriatrics and
General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Corresponding Author: Scott Wright, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Suite 2300, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA, Tel: 410-550-0817, Fax: 410-550-3403, Email: swright{at}jhmi.edu

Objective: To better understand the implications of inadequately recognizing clinical excellence in academia by exploring the perspectives of clinically excellent faculty within prominent American departments of medicine.

Design: Qualitative study.

Setting: 8 academic institutions.

Participants: 24 clinically excellent department of medicine physicians.

Methods: Between March 1 and May 31, 2007, investigators conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 24 clinically excellent physicians at leading academic institutions. Interview transcripts were independently coded by two investigators and compared for agreement. Content analysis identified themes related to clinical excellence in academia.

Results: Twenty informants (83%) were Associate Professors or Professors, 8 (33%) were females, and the physicians hailed from a wide range of internal medicine specialties. The mean percent effort spent in clinical care by the physicians was 48%. The five domains that emerged related to academic medicine’s failure to recognize clinical excellence were: (1) low morale and prestige among clinicians, (2) less than excellent patient care, (3) loss of talented clinicians, (4) a lack of commitment to improve patient care systems, and (5) fewer excellent clinician role models to inspire trainees.

Conclusions: If academic medical centers fail to recognize clinical excellence among its physicians, they may be doing a disservice to the patients that they pledge to serve. It is hoped that initiatives aiming to measure clinical performance in our academic medical centers will translate into meaningful recognition for those achieving excellence such that outstanding clinicians may feel valued and decide to stay in academia.

Key Words: Academia • Patient care • Promotion

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Aronoff And Then There Were None: The Consequences of Academia Losing Clinically Excellent Physicians Clin. Med. Res., December 1, 2009; 7(4): 125 - 126. [Full Text] [PDF]