|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Overview |



* Division of Infectious Diseases and
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System Ann Arbor, Michigan
Corresponding Author: David M. Aronoff, MD, 4618 Medical Sciences Building II, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5623, Tel: 734-647-1786, Fax: 734-763-4168, Email: daronoff{at}umich.edu
Received: June 15, 2009.
Revised: September 1, 2009.
Accepted: September 9, 2009.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Acyclovir Encephalitis Herpes infections Meningitis
Viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are not uncommon occurrences in clinical practice; however, the incidence of these cases is not well defined. Patients usually present with clinical features of aseptic meningitis and/or encephalitis of varying degrees of severity. The outcomes are also variable, depending on unclearly defined host- and organism-specific factors, ranging from generally benign, in cases of aseptic meningitis, to severe with neurological sequelae and even death in patients with encephalitis. While the etiology of many cases remains unknown, an increasing number of positive viral identifications are made, particularly since the advent of molecular diagnostics. A specific therapy is unfortunately available for only a few viruses (eg, herpes viruses, human immunodeficiency virus), but efforts for finding the causative organisms remain important for management (and prognosis) of patients. Clinical and laboratory features common to particular viral etiologies can guide clinicians in identifying potential pathogens. The purpose of this article is to use clinical cases to review, for both primary care providers and acute care practitioners, diagnostic and therapeutic highlights of common viral CNS infections. The cases described in this report were evaluated within the same two-week period on a busy inpatient infectious diseases consultation service at a tertiary care, academic medical center.
| Case Presentations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Case 2
A 72-year-old man with polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis treated with oral methotrexate 2.5 mg weekly and oral prednisone 10 mg daily presented with fatigue, mental status changes, and headache for 1 day. Physical examination was notable for a temperature of 101.9 F and blood pressure 185/94 mmHg. He was alert and oriented to person, place, and time; however, he was only able to answer simple questions. He had no nuchal rigidity, focal neurologic deficits, or rash. Laboratory tests revealed a normal white blood cell count, electrolytes, and renal function. CSF studies revealed 0 red blood cells/mm3, 120 white blood cells/mm3 (4% neutrophils, 64% lymphocytes), glucose of 53 mg/dL, protein of 106 mg/dL, and a negative Gram stain (table 1
). Repeat CSF studies at 72 hours showed 0 red blood cells/mm3, 155 white blood cells/mm3 (1% neutrophils, 93% lymphocytes, 6% histiocytes), glucose of 64 mg/dL, and protein of 104 mg/dL. Blood, urine, and CSF cultures were negative. Head CT and chest radiograph were unremarkable. He was started empirically on ceftriaxone IV 1 g every 24 hours, vancomycin IV 1 g every 12 hours, ampicillin IV 2 g every 4 hours, and acyclovir 10 mg/kg every 8 hours. Additionally, because of a history of Coccidiodes granulomatous lung disease, he was started on fluconazole. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was unremarkable. The patients CSF Coccidiodes antigen was negative but PCR for varicella zoster virus (VZV) was positive. He was continued on acyclovir while hospitalized. The patients mental status returned to baseline over the course of 5 days. He was discharged home on valacyclovir 1g orally three times daily for total duration of treatment of 3 weeks. The patient regained his mental status and had no long-term sequelae.
Case 3
An 86-year-old female with hypertension presented with mental status changes for 5 days. On the first day of her illness, she presented to a local emergency department complaining of nausea, diarrhea, throat pain, and dry emesis. Physical examination was notable for mild confusion and a noncontrasted CT scan of the head was unremarkable. She was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and gastroesophageal reflux and discharged home with prescriptions for nitrofurantoin and ranitidine. Over the next few days, she developed increasing confusion, word-finding difficulties, and gait instability. She was brought to the emergency department. Physical examination was remarkable for a temperature of 103 F and blood pressure of 202/86 mmHg. She was oriented only to self, with word-finding difficulties and perseveration. She had no nuchal rigidity, focal motor or sensory neurologic deficits, or rashes. Laboratory tests revealed a white blood cell count of 15,000 cells/mm3, sodium of 125 mmol/L, and potassium of 2.7 mmol/L. CSF studies revealed 24 red blood cells/mm3, 3 white blood cells/mm3 (4% neutrophils, 20% lymphocytes, 76% histiocytes), glucose of 87 mg/dL, protein of 40 mg/dL, and a negative Gram stain (table 1
). Blood, urine, and CSF cultures were negative. Head CT and chest radiograph were unremarkable. She was treated empirically with parenteral ceftriaxone 1g every 24 hours and vancomycin 1g every 24 hours. She was noted to be delirious, and parenteral acyclovir 10 mg/kg every 8 hours was begun approximately 48 hours after admission to treat for possible herpes simplex virus infection. Brain MRI revealed abnormal signal within the left temporal lobe (figure 1
). PCR on CSF for herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) was positive. Electroencephalogram (EEG) revealed left temporal periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges with no clinical correlation suggesting subclinical seizures. The patient was started on levetiracetam and phenytoin to suppress epileptic activity. A 21-day course of IV acyclovir therapy was given. She has had gradual clinical improvement in her mental status. At 6 months, she continues to have residual expressive aphasia with some word finding and short-term memory difficulties.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients afflicted by these heterogeneous disorders often present acutely to their primary care providers or to acute care practitioners for evaluation. The cases described above and discussed below illustrate commonalities and distinctions between these two entities and underscore important clinical and diagnostic aspects of viral CNS infections in adults.
The initial approach to the patient with suspected CNS infection requires an early recognition of the meningitis and/or encephalitis syndrome, and needs to include a rapid diagnostic evaluation coupled with concurrent antimicrobial and adjunctive therapy (eg, corticosteroids, when indicated). Delay in the initiation of therapy introduces the potential for increased morbidity and mortality, such as in cases of acute bacterial meningitis and herpes encephalitis.3 It is also important to distinguish a true CNS infection from non-infectious causes of encephalopathy (such as hepatic, renal, or other metabolic encephalopathies).4 Additionally, it is important to note that the differential diagnosis of aseptic meningitis includes other infectious etiologies such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, fungi and parasites, as well as non-infectious causes including malignancy, vasculitis and certain medications.
Viral Etiologies of CNS Infections
Viruses can cause meningitis or encephalitis, and the clinical presentation may overlap, with the latter having more significant alterations in the level of consciousness and possibly new psychiatric symptoms, cognitive defects, seizures, or focal neurologic deficits.2 The presentation of viral CNS infections is usually of a sudden onset of illness with fever, headache, nuchal rigidity, focal neurological signs, CSF pleocytosis, and focal abnormalities may be seen on EEG, CT and/or MRI. The diagnosis of meningitis or encephalitis is based upon which features predominate in the illness although meningoencephalitis is also a common term that recognizes the overlap. Distinguishing between encephalitis and meningitis is important because the likely etiology and subsequent management of each is different.2
A detailed history can provide clues for an etiologic diagnosis.3 Occurrence during summer suggests arbovirus (eg, West Nile virus) or enterovirus infection, while winter disease suggests other infections (eg, influenza).3 The travel history can reveal clues to geographically-restricted viruses, such as those predominantly found in Asia (Japanese encephalitis). Other points include taking a history of sexual contacts (eg, HIV), insect contact (eg, mosquitoes harboring Western and Eastern equine viruses, West Nile virus), animal contact (eg, rabies virus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus [LCMV]), recent vaccination or viral illness (eg, acute demyelinating meningoencephalitis); and immunosuppression (eg, human herpes virus 6, VZV, cytomegalovirus, or JC virus) (table 2
).
|
A LP is important. Interpreting the results can be difficult, as there is overlap between the CSF findings in bacterial and viral infections, however broad general differences can be stated.2 In acute bacterial meningitis, CSF white cell counts are usually high (hundreds or thousands per µl), with neutrophilic predominance, accompanied by elevated proteins and hypoglycorrachia; while in viral meningitis CSF shows a mild pleocytosis and lymphocytic predominance (though early it can be neutrophilic), slightly elevated protein, and normal glucose (except LCMV when glucose is low).2
Nucleic acid amplification methods have improved the detection of common (HSV, enterovirus, and VZV) and uncommon viral pathogens. The results of these tests are available more quickly and are more sensitive than viral cultures. Other viral causes of meningoencephalitis, such as arboviruses (including West Nile), can be identified by detection of IgM and IgG antibodies in CSF.3
Imaging with CT scans alone can be done in uncomplicated cases of meningitis, but MRI should be considered for all patients with encephalitis. The MRI is generally useful for confirmation of diagnosis of encephalitis, and sometimes there are characteristic patterns on imaging that may suggest a particular etiology, such as edema and hemorrhage in the temporal lobes in patients with herpes simplex encephalitis.6 This finding was obvious in our third case (figure 1
). Another neurodiagnostic test that should be considered in the diagnosis of viral encephalitis is the EEG, particularly in confused or obtunded patients who may have nonconvulsive seizure activity, as exemplified by our third case.3
Enterovirus CNS Infections
The first case presented above represents enterovirus meningitis. Approximately 26% of adult aseptic meningitis cases for which an etiologic agent is identified are caused by enteroviruses.7 These infections generally occur in the summer and fall, but can occur in any season, as in our first case that was diagnosed in November. The clinical picture is commonly difficult to distinguish from bacterial meningitis; therefore, patients are frequently hospitalized, empiric antibiotic are prescribed, and multiple diagnostic tests are done. The course of enteroviral meningitis is benign, and therapy is directed at symptomatic relief. The CSF enterovirus PCR has proven to be a sensitive test with great cost-saving capabilities, as those who test positive tend to have shorter hospital stays, fewer tests performed, and receive IV antibiotics for less time.8
Varicella Zoster Virus Encephalitis
Varicella zoster virus (VZV) encephalitis is an important cause of viral encephalitis, with mortality reported in up to 25% of cases.9 As exemplified by our second case, VZV has been associated with older age and with immunosuppression. It can present before, after, or in the absence of the dermatomal rash of shingles, making the clinical suspicion difficult in the latter case. In immunocompetent individuals, VZV causes large-vessel vasculitis manifested as ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, generally weeks to months after herpes zoster ophthalmicus. In immunosupressed patients, VZV causes a multifocal small vessel vasculopathy. On imaging, it presents as ovoid, round lesions at the gray-white matter junction. PCR can detect VZV DNA in CSF, however, a negative test does not exclude the diagnosis of VZV encephalitis.3 IgM antibodies can sometimes be detected in CSF in such cases. Therapy with acyclovir 10 mg/kg every 8 hours is recommended for 10 to 14 days.3,10
Herpes Simplex Encephalitis
HSV-1 is the most common cause of viral encephalitis. Herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) remains one of the most devastating infections of the central nervous system, with high morbidity and mortality despite available antiviral therapy. About half of treated patients die or are left with severe impairment.11 Clinical suspicion of HSE is suggested by encephalopathy and/or focal neurological symptoms in a febrile patient, but these are not specific. Imaging evaluation can provide support for the diagnosis by the demonstration of temporal lobe edema/hemorrhage on MRI (figure 1
). The diagnostic gold standard is the detection of HSV DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid by PCR. The HSV PCR has been noted to have a high sensitivity, around 96% to 98%. In cases with negative results but high clinical suspicion, the test should be repeated after 3 to 7 days, as the detection of virus may be difficult in the first few day of illness.3 Acyclovir is the treatment of choice and is administered at 10 mg/kg every 8 hours for 14 to 21 days.3,11 Our case was initially thought to have an encephalopathy secondary to a urinary tract infection. HSE was only diagnosed 5 days after the onset of symptoms, which may have contributed to the severity of illness. This case illustrates the need for high clinical suspicion with concomitant therapy initiation pending laboratory confirmatory testing.
Empirical Management
Upon presentation, patients who are immunocompromised, have a history of CNS disease, papilledema, or focal neurologic deficits, should have a CT scan of the head prior to LP.
Patients with a clinical picture suggestive of meningitis should be investigated for the possibility of bacterial and viral causes (eg, enterovirus, HSV-2) for the purpose of establishing the diagnosis and potential avoidance of unnecessary hospitalization and/or antibiotic treatment. If there is concern for bacterial meningitis, therapy should not be delayed by waiting for final results of the diagnostic studies (CT scan and LP).
If clues for encephalitis are suggested by history (sudden onset of fever and encephalopathy), exam (seizures), or studies (red cells in CSF, temporal lobe involvement on imaging), empiric therapy with intravenous acyclovir 10mg/kg every 8 hours needs to be initiated in all patients as soon as possible.3 An MRI and EEG should also be performed in all patients with encephalitis.3 Rarely, brain biopsy is needed in patients with encephalitis of unknown etiology whose condition worsens in spite of therapy with acyclovir.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |