HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Giampietro, P. F. Articles by Schowalter, D. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Giampietro, P. F. Articles by Schowalter, D. B.

Congenital and Idiopathic Scoliosis: Clinical and Genetic Aspects

Medical Genetics Services, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin

Robert D. Blank, MD, PhD

Section of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Cathleen L. Raggio, MD

Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York

Sajid Merchant, MS, BSc

Medical Genetics Services, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin

F. Stig Jacobsen, MD

Department of Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin

Thomas Faciszewski, MD

Department of Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin

Sanjay K. Shukla, PhD

Clinical Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin

Anne R. Greenlee, PhD

Reproductive Toxicology, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin

Cory Reynolds, MS, BS

Clinical Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin

David B. Schowalter, MD, PhD

Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

REPRINT REQUESTS: Philip F. Giampietro, MD, PhD, Medical Genetics Services, Marshfield Clinic, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449, Telephone: 715-389-4456, Fax: 715-389-4399, Email: giampietro.philip{at}marshfieldclinic.org

Received: February 5, 2003.

Accepted: March 7, 2003.

	Abstract

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
OBJECTIVE

Genetic and environmental factors influencing spinal development in lower vertebrates are likely to play a role in the abnormalities associated with human congenital scoliosis (CS) and idiopathic scoliosis (IS). An overview of the molecular embryology of spinal development and the clinical and genetic aspects of CS and IS are presented. Utilizing synteny analysis of the mouse and human genetic databases, likely candidate genes for human CS and IS were identified.

DESIGN

Review and synteny analysis.

METHODS

A search of the Mouse Genome Database was performed for "genes," "markers" and "phenotypes" in the categories Neurological and neuromuscular, Skeleton, and Tail and other appendages. The Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man was used to determine whether each mouse locus had a known human homologue. If so, the human homologue was assigned candidate gene status. Linkage maps of the chromosomes carrying loci with possibly relevant phenotypes, but without known human homologues, were examined and regions of documented synteny between the mouse and human genomes were identified.

RESULTS

Searching the Mouse Genome Database by phenotypic category yielded 100 mutants of which 66 had been mapped. The descriptions of each of these 66 loci were retrieved to determine which among these included phenotypes of scoliosis, kinky or bent tails, other vertebral abnormalities, or disturbances of axial skeletal development. Forty-five loci of interest remained, and for 27 of these the comparative linkage maps of mouse and human were used to identify human syntenic regions to which plausible candidate genes had been mapped.

CONCLUSION

Synteny analysis of mouse candidate genes for CS and IS holds promise due to the close evolutionary relationship between mice and human beings. With the identification of additional genes in animal model systems that contribute to different stages of spine development, the list of candidate genes for CS and IS will continue to grow.

Key Words: Congenital scoliosis • Synteny • Idiopathic scoliosis • Spinal development • Developmental genes

	INTRODUCTION

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
Scoliosis may be broken down into two distinct categories, congenital scoliosis (CS) and idiopathic scoliosis (IS). CS is defined as a lateral curvature of the spine due to a developmental abnormality. Scoliosis present at birth that is not associated with an underlying developmental anomaly is referred to as infantile scoliosis. An incidence of approximately 0.5 to 1/1,000 births has been observed for CS.^1,2 This value was obtained by reviewing a series of 15,000 chest films in the state of Delaware (lumbar vertebral defects were not examined). Vertebral defects most commonly include hemivertebrae, block vertebrae, butterfly and wedged vertebra, and unsegmented bars (figures 1 and 2). Hemivertebrae usually represent an extra vertebral segment. Vertebral malformations that result in CS may be associated with genetic syndromes such as Alagille syndrome,³ spondylocostal dysostosis,⁴ and Jarcho-Levin syndrome.⁵ By definition, the curve in the frontal plane as viewed on a posteroanterior standing radiograph of the spine must be greater than 10 degrees.⁶ Although a single plane is used to establish the diagnosis, scoliosis is in fact a three dimensional deformity. As such, it results in the alteration of the normal sagittal thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis.

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Commonly encountered vertebral malformations associated with CS including an unsegmented bar (A), single hemivertebrae (B) and multiple hemivertebrae (C).

View larger version (118K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Radiograph illustrating multiple segmentation abnormalities of the thoracic spine.

Non-congenital scoliosis has many etiologies.¹⁰ The hereditary musculoskeletal disorders, such as osteogenesis imper-fecta,¹¹ Marfan syndrome,¹² Stickler syndrome,¹³ Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,¹⁴ and the muscular dystrophies,¹⁵ can each include scoliosis as a manifestation. Neuromuscular diseases, such as cerebral palsy and myelomeningocele, are associated with the development of scoliosis secondary to muscle imbalance.^16,17 Paralytic disorders resulting from polio or spinal trauma may lead to a progressive scoliosis. Radiation therapy, tumors and syrinx formation have also been implicated as etiologies of scoliosis. CS may also be associated with myelodysplasia.

CS is classified by orthopedists as a failure of segmentation (partial or completely fused vertebrae), failure of formation (such as hemivertebrae) and mixed defects. Each of these may cause development of a spinal curve based on asymmetric growth. The severity of the curve is related to the type of defect and whether or not the primary problem is accompanied by any compensatory developmental changes.

As the spinal curvature progresses, pulmonary function may be compromised if the deformity occurs in the thoracic region. Restrictive lung function is associated with spinal curvature that approaches 90 degrees.¹⁸ The most significant pulmonary compromise is associated with severe scoliotic curves in young children associated with multiple thoracic vertebral anomalies. Surgical treatment at an early age has been recommended in this group of patients.

The progression and ultimate prognosis are dependent upon the specific vertebral anomaly and anatomic location.^19,20 Hemivertebrae will usually result in a curve that exceeds 40 degrees by 10 years, except in instances where two hemiver-tebrae occupy an adjacent and opposite orientation on the spinal column. Multiple hemivertebrae on the same side are associated with a more rapid progression and usually require treatment before 5 years. A unilateral unsegmented bar has a very high likelihood of resulting in severe progressive scoliosis. An unsegmented bar with a hemivertebrae is associated with the most severe prognosis, with the possibility of a spinal curve exceeding 50 degrees by 3 years of age. Not all congenital vertebral malformations result in CS. For instance, two hemivertebrae may occupy an adjacent and opposite orientation on the spinal column. In this situation progressive deformity would not occur because the vertebral malformations are balanced and together do not result in increased spinal curvature.

	ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
Because CS arises from significant developmental disruptions, involvement of other organ systems is common. Spinal cord anomalies are particularly widespread, occurring in up to 20% of CS cases.¹⁰ Common associated abnormalities are found in the nervous, urogenital, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular systems. Specific abnormalities include esophageal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula, diastemato-myelia and other congenital spinal anomalies, anal atresia, Sprengel’s deformity, facial asymmetry and bladder and cloacal exstrophy.^21–23 Additional associations include the Klippel-Feil syndrome (short neck, low posterior hairline, fusion of cervical vertebrae), Goldenhar’s syndrome (associated with craniofacial anomalies, including microtia and epibulbar dermoids due to abnormal branchial arch development), incontinentia pigmenti (hyperpigmented whorls and streaks associated with eye, skin, hair, nail, teeth and central nervous system abnormalities), other recognizable syndromes, or the VACTERL association (Vertebral malformations, Anal atresia, Cardiac malformations, TracheoEsopha-geal fistula, Renal and Radial anomalies and Limb defects).

Genitourinary abnormalities have been reported to occur in 37 of 85 (43%) of patients with CS.²⁴ Since the genitouri-nary system and vertebral column are both mesoderm in origin and develop during the fifth week of embryonic life, insults to the embryo during this period could result in both CS and genitourinary tract abnormalities. A 13% incidence of renal and ureteral abnormalities in patients with CS has been reported.²⁵ Renal ectopia was observed to occur in conjunction with scoliosis with a 10-fold increase in chicks with CS induced by surgical technique.²⁶ Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the association between CS and renal anomalies, including a failure of spine growth interfering with normal renal ascent, teratogenic agents and intrinsic genetic defects.

There is some evidence in the literature to support the development of organ malformations at the body segment at which vertebral malformations occur.⁴ In a series of 26 patients with multiple vertebral segmentation defects, all patients with congenital heart disease had thoracic involvement, 4 of 6 patients with renal anomalies were found to have lumbar involvement, and all 5 patients with imperforate anus were found to have lumbar involvement.

The developmental field concept described by Opitz is useful in providing a framework for understanding multisystem involvement. Developmental field defects are defined as "any dysmorphogenetically reactive unit of the developing organism that leads to final structure."²⁷ If a specific pattern of malformation can be attributable to different causes, then a developmental field defect is identified. For example, the association of segmentation anomalies of the spine and ribs in a series of 110 patients with multiple etiologies, including monogenic syndromes, chromosomal abnormalities, environmental agents, and unknown causes, provides evidence that vertebral and rib anomalies constitute a developmental field defect.²⁸ Through observation of a variable pattern of congenital malformations within the VACTERL complex associated with different etiologies, evidence has been provided for VACTERL complex representing a primary poly-topic field defect.²⁹ Identification of genes associated with CS and malformations involving the genitourinary system, central nervous system and digestive system would extend this hypothesis.

	MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CS AND IS

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
Once CS is identified on clinical exam, x-ray studies and evaluation by a pediatric orthopedic surgeon are indicated. Approximately 50% of patients with CS ultimately require surgical correction because of curve progression.¹⁰ Computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans may be required for further delineation of underlying vertebral and spinal cord anomalies. An evaluation for associated cardiac and renal anomalies should be performed. Early identification of CS and treatment are important for maintaining maximal pulmonary function in patients with thoracic deformities.

Infantile idiopathic scoliosis most often spontaneously regresses, whereas juvenile onset scoliosis is more likely to progress.³⁰ Treatment includes casting and bracing when there is progression of scoliosis.³¹ If these conservative measures fail, surgical management with rodding for stabilization and fusion (arthrodesis) of vertebral levels to prevent growth is recommended during late adolescence.

	GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS AND IS

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
While the absolute numbers are not large, CS is relatively common among congenital malformations. Using chromosomal deletion mapping,³² a total of 114 cases of scoliosis among 1,753 patients with multiple congenital anomalies associated with various chromosome deletions were identified. Significant associations with haploinsufficiency for chromosomal loci 2p13-15, 6q13, or 15q12 were found, implying that genes mapping to these regions play a role in the development of CS and IS.

Two studies have provided evidence for a sporadic occurrence of CS.^2,33 In both studies, a sibling risk for neural tube defects of approximately 5% was reported, suggesting an etiological association between vertebral malformations and neural tube defects.

CS has also been observed in identical twins.^34–37 Different mechanisms have been postulated including non-genetic factors,³⁸ abnormalities of cleavage and somite formation,³⁶ or abnormalities in blood supply, or to a failure of cartilage formation in the mesenchymal tissues.³⁷ Monozygotic twin females concordant for the presence of right thoracic scoliosis and supravalvular pulmonic stenosis have been reported.³⁵ The first twin had a lumbar hemivertebrae and absent left kidney. The second twin had no congenital vertebral malformations. This finding provides evidence for multiple genetic loci and/or modifying genes that contribute toward the development of CS and IS.

In addition, occasional familial clusters, often with associated fused ribs and segmentation defects, have been noted.^39–44 These include spondylocostal dysostosis, a sporadic autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive short-trunk, short-stature syndrome that is characterized by non-progressive kyphoscoliosis, multiple hemivertebrae and rib fusion abnormalities, and spondylothoracic dysostosis, a severe and frequently lethal skeletal dysplasia which presents with a crab-like chest on x-ray. A gene for autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis has been localized to chromosome 19q13.1-q13.3.⁴⁴ Three mutations in three different families with autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis have been described.⁴⁵ These mutations include two protein truncating mutations and a missense mutation.

An autosomal recessive form of CS observed in male and female siblings of Iranian ancestry has been described.⁴⁶ The children’s parents were first cousins. The spinal x-rays were consistent for thoracic scoliosis, lack of segmentation of thoracic vertebrae, and multiple rib fusions. The female child had a small, abnormally shaped left kidney. Their curve patterns differed from those encountered in both spondylocostal dysplasia and spondylothoracic dysplasia.

Unlike CS, several reports in the literature support the existence of a strong hereditary component in the development of IS, but there is uncertainty regarding its mode of inheritance. Evidence for autosomal dominant with variable penetrance, multifactorial and X-linked dominant modes of inheritance has been reported.⁸ A locus for autosomal dominant IS has been identified corresponding to 17p11 in a three generation family of Italian ancestry with 11 affected individuals.⁹ Although mutations in heparin sulfotransferase genes, HS3ST3A1 and HS3ST3B1, are prevalent in this region, no mutations have been identified in these genes in two affected family members.

Interestingly, among 237 families who had at least one case of known CS, 17.3% reported having members with IS.⁴⁷ This observation could be due to chance. Alternatively it is possible that CS and IS share an underlying genetic mechanism, and that a single genetic defect can result in a predisposition to different types of spinal deformities.

Because CS is usually a sporadic condition, it is generally not possible to use conventional genetic linkage studies to identify chromosome regions that contribute to the development of this disorder. Data obtained from cytogenetic studies or genetic mapping studies will have to be supplemented, either by candidate genes identified by other strategies or by a broad-based mutation screen.

	OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOME OF THE MAJOR GENES INVOLVED

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
Within the past two decades a great deal of information has been learned about the molecular embryology of spine development through the study of mouse and chick embryos. Positional information along the rostrocaudal and anterior posterior axes is laid down during gastrulation.⁴⁸ The discovery of homeobox genes in Drosophila (HOM-C)⁴⁹ and their counterparts in vertebrates (Hox) provide strong evidence for similarities in the segmentation process in metazoa, plants and fungi.⁵⁰ Hox genes are transcription factors that are involved in the specification of positional information along the rostrocaudal axis. They represent a subgroup of the homeobox gene family, which contains a 180 bp DNA sequence encoding a DNA-binding domain as part of a "homeoprotein."⁴⁹ The Hox family has been studied in great detail in multiple organisms, and homeotic mutations which resemble human dysmorphic syndromes include human synpolydactyly, associated with an in-frame insertion of polyalanine stretches in HOXD13, and human hand-foot-genital syndrome, which is due to a nonsense mutation in HOXA13.⁵⁰ Hox genes are expressed in mesodermally and ectodermally derived cells along the body axis. A specific "Hox code" defined by Kessel and Gruss⁵¹ determines vertebral anatomy. There are four gene clusters, Hox A, B, C and D, containing 39 genes that are located on 4 different chromosomes. In general, genes at the 3' end of a particular cluster are expressed earlier and, with the exception of the second genes in the cluster, occupy more anterior expression domains.⁴⁹ Specification of vertebral position information is thought to be achieved by an interplay of Hox genes that are expressed at a given axial level.

In the initial stage of vertebral development (figure 3), cells from the epiblast ingress through the primitive streak and spread internally to form the endoderm followed by the mesoderm, notably the notochord which is located in the midline, and the paraxial mesoderm. Spherical clusters of mesenchymal cells called somitomeres⁵² precede the development of somites that in turn develop into vertebrae, ribs, skeletal muscle and dermis.⁵³ In addition, the paraxis gene has been shown to be responsible for normal somite formation in mice.⁵⁴ Paraxis codes for a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor which is expressed in paraxial mesoderm and somites. Mice that are homozygous for a paraxis null mutation do not form somites and develop an improperly patterned axial skeleton and musculature.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. A schematic diagram of murine embryologic development of somite, sclerotome and vertebral body with some of the murine genes involved at different stages. Segmentation is mediated by a molecular segmentation clock operating through the Notch signaling pathway. Segmental boundary formation is mediated by decreased concentrations of fibroblast growth factor 8. Pax1 and Mox1 are involved in sclerotome condensation and subdivision into anterior and posterior halves. Transverse embryo sections and corresponding frontal embryo sections are shown. Other genes such as Gli2, Unex4.1, BMP-7 and Jun are involved in vertebrae differentiation and ossification.

MesP1 and MesP2 are beta-helix-loop-helix transcription factors that show segmental expression in the presomitic mesoderm.⁵⁹ Studies performed in zebrafish⁶⁰ have provided evidence that these genes are involved in the development of the anterior-posterior polarity within the developing somite through interaction with the fibroblast growth factor R and Delta-Notch signaling pathways.

The somite subsequently undergoes differentiation to the ventromedial and dorsomedial regions. The ventromedial region gives rise to the sclerotome (figure 3). The dorsolat-eral region gives rise to the dermomyotome. The posterior half of one sclerotome and the anterior half of its caudal neighbor fuse to form the nascent vertebral body. Sonic hedgehog protein^61,62 has been hypothesized to play a role in sclerotome formation. Experimental evidence suggests that in the platelet-derived growth factor-a receptor is involved with normal patterning of somites. Pdgfra null mutant embryos display predominantly cervical segmentation defects, rib fusions, spina bifida occulta and truncated acromion. This phenotype has similarities to Klippel-Feil syndrome.⁶³

Cells within the posterior half of the lateral sclerotome are destined to form the neural arch. Densely packed cells located at the anterior sclerotomal center give rise to the intervertebral disc. The less cell dense areas between the intervertebral disc regions form the anlage of the vertebral body. The Pax1 gene has been shown to be active during sclerotome formation and differentiation. Pax1 mutations have been identified in undulated mice, suggesting that scle-rotome condensation is a Pax1 dependent process.⁶⁴ In the mouse mutant undulated, medial sclerotome condensation does not occur at the lumbosacral level, thus preventing the formation of intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies as a result of faulty sclerotome condensation. Mox1 is also involved in the subdivision of sclerotomes into a posterior and anterior half.⁶⁵ A mouse mutant "rib-vertebrae" (rv) has recently been described by Nacke et al.⁶⁶ Homozygous rv mice have phenotypic features characterized by vertebral and rib defects and urogenital malformations. Somites are irregular in size. Both Pax1 and Mox1 are abnormally expressed. Based on these observations, the rv mutation results in elongation of the presomitic mesoderm and disruption of the anterior-posterior polarization of somites.

As vertebral development progresses, the prevertebrae are subsequently converted into cartilage during the sixth week of gestation. Endochondral ossification begins during the ninth week. Bone morphogenic protein (BMP) molecules are related to transforming growth factor-ß and represent a group of osteoinductive cytokines from the bone matrix. Mice that are homozygous for the BMP-7 null allele display various skeletal defects, including lack of fusion of the neural spines of the atlas, twelfth thoracic, and first sacral vertebrae, openings on the side(s) of the neural arches of the third and fourth thoracic vertebrae, and absence of a lumbar vertebrae.⁶⁷ Intervertebral disks have unequal thickness, resulting in tail kinks. Mutant mice have small or nonexistent ossification centers. It has been postulated that the BMP-7 protein is required for the normal ossification process to occur.

The notochord eventually regresses to form the nucleus pul-posus. Jun, a major component of the heterodimeric transcription factor AP-1 is required for axial skeletogenesis through the regulation of notochord survival.⁶⁸ Jun deficient mice die during midgestation and develop scoliosis due to fusion of vertebral bodies.

	USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY CANDIDATE GENES FOR HUMAN CS AND IS

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
The first major goal of the "genome project" was to identify and map thousands of markers in the human and mouse genomes. This task has been completed.^69,70 Work to date has made it apparent that family relationships among genes have been conserved over evolution. One practical result of these findings is that genes harboring functionally important mutations in model organisms become candidates for corresponding human diseases, sharing features of the mutant phenotypes. Moreover, we have learned that chromosomal organization is highly conserved in these two species, with the preservation of linkage arrangements among groups of neighboring genes over evolution. Only about 200 chromosome rearrangements are thought to have occurred since the human and murine lineages diverged.^71,72 A second practical consequence of the genome project’s progress, therefore, is that genetic mapping data from the mouse can be used to predict the locations of corresponding human genes. An extensive collection of conserved synteny data is conveniently accessible via the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s Human/Mouse Homology Relationships Web site.⁷³

Synteny conservation was used as the basis to identify potential human candidate genes by map position. We therefore undertook a systematic review of mouse mutations with skeletal, tail, or neuromuscular phenotypes with the goal of identifying potential human candidate genes for CS and IS.⁷⁴ When the human homologue of the mouse mutant gene was known, this became a candidate. When such a homologue was not known, the established syntenic relationships between the two species were used to identify additional human candidate genes by their chromosomal locations. We report the results of this review, which have subsequently been updated, yielding a relatively small number of human candidate genes meeting our criteria for inclusion.

	METHODS

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
A search of the Mouse Genome Database on the Mouse Genome Informatics Web site⁷⁵ was performed for "genes," "markers" and "phenotypes" in the categories Neurological and neuromuscular, Skeleton, and Tail and other appendages. Retrieved loci were reviewed for possible scoliotic phenotypes, choosing at this point to err in being more, rather than less inclusive. Either the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man Web site,⁷⁶ or the Genome Database Web site was used.⁷⁷ The Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man site was used to determine whether each mouse locus has a known human homologue. If so, the human homologue was assigned candidate gene status. Linkage maps of the chromosomes carrying loci with possibly relevant phenotypes, but without known human homologues, were examined and regions of documented synteny between the mouse and human genomes were identified. Mouse loci mapping to regions in which synteny is not well-conserved or mapping close to syntenic region endpoints were excluded from further analysis. The Genome Database Web site⁷⁷ was then used to identify human genes mapping within ~5% of the map position specified by the synteny map. The descriptions of the identified human genes were reviewed, and once again liberal criteria was used for assignment of candidate status.

	RESULTS

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
Searching the Mouse Genome Database by phenotypic category yielded 100 mutants of which 66 had been mapped. Next the descriptions of each of the 66 loci were retrieved to determine which among these included phenotypes of scoliosis, kinky or bent tails, other vertebral abnormalities, or disturbances of axial skeletal development. Forty-five loci of interest remained at this point, and for 27 of these the comparative linkage maps of mouse and human were used to identify human syntenic regions to which plausible candidate genes had been mapped (table 1). For each of these ‘synteny candidates,’ the mouse locus symbol, locus name, map position, corresponding human map position, and human candidate gene(s) symbol are listed. Thus, by reading across each entry in the table, the process used for assessing each locus is briefly recapitulated.

	DISCUSSION

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

Pax1
Three mutant alleles (undulated, undulated-extreme and undulated-short tail) of Pax1 have been described in the mouse. All three mutations reduce or eliminate Pax1 gene expression and cause deficient development of the anterior vertebral element.⁷⁸ Scoliosis, split and fused vertebrae, and hypomorphic intervertebral discs, more prominently in the more posterior regions of the body, result. Pax1 appears to be important in specifying ventromedial differentiation of the sclerotome, thus accounting for the vertebral abnormalities seen in the various undulated mutant alleles. Murine Pax1 maps to 80 cM on chromosome 2,⁷⁹ while the human homologue maps to 20p11 by somatic cell hybrid and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis.⁸⁰ The mutant diminutive (dm) which causes decreased viability, decreased body size, macrocytic anemia, extra ribs, vertebral deformations, and short, kinked tails,⁸¹ maps to 82 cM,⁸² and may be an additional Pax1 allele. However mutation analysis of Pax1 in dm/dm mice failed to find any coding-region lesions.

Dll3
The Dll3 gene is a homologue of the Drosophila Notch lig-and Delta⁸³ and is located at 6 cM on mouse chromosome 7.⁸⁴ This locus was recently shown to harbor the pudgy (pu) gene.⁸³ The mutation disrupts the proper formation of morphological borders in early somite development and formation of rostral-caudal compartment boundaries within somites. The mutation may have arisen as a consequence of x-ray exposure and leads to multiple axial skeletal abnormalities in affected animals. The vertebral column, which is drastically shortened along its entire length, is composed of a mixture of irregular fused vertebrae and incompletely developed vertebral bodies interspersed with occasional normal vertebrae. Multiple rib fusions occur which involve the sternum, particularly in the caudal half of the thoracic region. In embryonic development, animals have indistinct, late-appearing, and shortened somites. Segmentation does not occur as far distally as in normal embryos. Adults have shortened, toad-like bodies and both viability and fertility are impaired.⁸⁵ An underlying abnormality in the process of segmentation appears to be the mechanism underlying the pu/pu phenotype. Crowe et al⁸⁶ demonstrated that the Notch and Delta ligands are involved in patterning development of feather buds in the chick embryo, highlighting their role in numerous cell fate decisions in different organisms. Alagille syndrome is associated with vertebral segmentation defects and mutations in the jagged gene (JAG1), a ligand of the Notch receptor.⁸⁷

The human region syntenic to the mouse Dll3 is 19q13.2-13.3.^73,88 On the basis of genome-wide scanning by homozygosity mapping in a large consanguineous Arab-Israeli family with six affected family members, a gene for autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis has been localized to this region,⁴⁴ corresponding to a gene coding the Notch ligand Delta-like 3 (Dll3). Mutations in three families with autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis have been identified, including two protein truncating mutations and a missense mutation.⁴⁵

Wnt3a
This gene is a member of a moderate-sized multigene family comprised of at least 12 members in humans and the mouse. Genes in this family function both in establishing the body plan in development and as potential oncogenes.⁸⁹ The Wnt proteins are relatively insoluble, have affinity for extracellu-lar proteoglycans, particularly heparin sulfate, and are secreted inefficiently.⁹⁰

This affinity for extracellular matrix components coupled with their growth-promoting actions provides a simple mechanistic framework for understanding their role in directing establishment of the body plan by promoting proliferation of cells over a limited anatomic region. Wnt3a is necessary for generation of the posterior portion of the neu-raxis, as knockout mice fail to develop a tailbud and are truncated from a point slightly anterior to the hindlimbs.⁹¹ A spontaneous mouse mutant, vestigial tail (vt), has a similar but less severe phenotype. Homozygous (vt/vt) mice develop a severely hypomorphic tail, with either a small filament only, or a short stump-like tail. Usually, there is absence of caudal vertebrae, with the remaining vertebrae exhibiting morphologic abnormalities. In some instances, presacral vertebrae are absent and two ossification centers are present in the caudal, lumbar and sacral vertebrae. Caudal neural tube anomalies were observed in regions corresponding to defective somite formation. Embryos display a reduction in the ventral ectodermal ridge of the tail at the tenth day of gestation. Accessory neural tubes are also observed.⁹² The Wnt3a gene has been localized to mouse chromosome 11 at 32cM. The human orthologue, Wnt3a, has been mapped to human chromosome 1q42 by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis.⁹³ It is approximately 53.0 kb long and composed of 4 exons.

Ky
A degenerative myopathy precedes the development of kyphoscoliosis in the ky mouse.⁹⁴ An absence of muscle hypertrophy in response to increased demand is not observed in ky mice. Muscles obtained from ky/ky mice are smaller and have slower and weaker muscle contractions as compared to control mice. A shift to the expression of slow muscle contractile protein isoforms including, myosin heavy chains and myosin light chains, occurs. The Ky gene has been localized on chromosome 9 at 56cM. The encoded gene is a novel muscle specific protein, not one of the myosin chains. A GC deletion in codon 24 that leads to a premature stop codon at position 125 has been observed in ky/ky mice. The human Ky orthologue falls into a conserved synteny region on 3q21. Myosin light polypeptide kinase is localized within this region and could possibly be a candidate gene for CS and IS.

Lmx1a
The phenotypic mutant Dr (dreher) falls within the Lmx1a: gene. Dreher mice have absence of interneurons in the dorsal spinal cord and granule neurons in the cerebellar cortex that result from a failure of roof plate development.⁹⁵ There is also a failure of formation of the dorsal neural arches. Lmx1a: serves an important function in the specification of dorsal cell fates in the central nervous system and in developing vertebrae. Using Northern analysis, Lmx1a: has been localized to the roof plate and immediate neighboring structures during early central nervous system development. Lmx1a: maps to a conserved synteny region, 1q22-q23, and stimulates transcription of insulin.⁹⁶

Fbn-2
The shaker-with-syndactylism (sy) phenotype is associated with auditory and vestibular defects, fusion of digits and early lethality.⁹⁷ A reduction in the caliber of the shafts of long bones and decreased bone density of the long bones of the limbs, girdles, and vertebrae have been observed. Loss of function mutations in Fbn-2 occurring outside of a "conserved neonatal region" has been observed in sy, sy^fp and sy^fp-2J.⁹⁸ In humans, Fbn-2 maps to a conserved synteny region on 5q23.3-3.1. Mutations in Fbn-2 are associated with congenital contractural arachnodactyly.⁹⁹ The association of scoliosis with congenital contractural arachnodactyly supports the candidacy of Fbn-2 for IS and CS.

Sim2
Sim2 mice have CS resulting from unequal sizes of ribs and vertebrae.¹⁰⁰ They die shortly after birth because of lung atelectasis and breathing failure. They also have diaphragm hypoplasia, rib protrusions and abnormal intercostal muscle attachments. It has been suggested that rib overgrowth in Sim2 mice is responsible for the development of CS. The expression of Sim2 in the vertebral body, and not the somites, provides evidence for its contribution toward the later stages of vertebral development by regulating their growth. Sim2 is localized to human chromosome 21q22.2 that shares synteny conservation with the 67.6 region of mouse chromosome 16.¹⁰¹ The 21q22.2 region is associated with many of the features of Down’s syndrome. Sim2 belongs to a family of transcription factors characterized by a basic helix-loop-helix-PAS (PER, ARNT, SIM) domain.¹⁰² Sim is responsible for midline central nervous system development in the fly.¹⁰³

	ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF CS

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
Vertebral malformations in humans have been reported to occur in association with alcohol,¹⁰⁴ anticonvulsant medications including valproic acid¹⁰⁵ and dilantin,¹⁰⁶ hyperthermia,¹⁰⁷ and maternal insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.¹⁰⁸ No epidemiologic studies have been performed to evaluate the association between environmental teratogens and vertebral malformations.

The association of spinal cord anomalies in humans and neural tube defects in mice with CS as described in the preceding sections, raises the possibility that similar etiologic mechanisms are involved in the development of these malformations. Folic acid use has been associated with the prevention of neural tube defects.¹⁰⁹ Further studies need to be performed to determine the possible effects antenatal folic acid use may have on the development of congenital vertebral malformations.

An association of vertebral malformations has been reported in Sprague-Dawley rat fetuses exposed to I(Kr)-blockers (class III antiarrhythmic agent) in utero.¹¹⁰ A temporary induction of hypoxia and reoxygenation injury via the induction of embryonic cardiac arrhythmia has been proposed as the mechanism of teratogenicity.

Thoracic vertebral malformations have been induced in a dose dependent fashion in mice with maternal exposure to carbon monoxide at 9 days of gestation.¹¹¹ Possible mechanisms for vertebral malformation include alteration of expression of homeobox genes or sonic hedgehog by carbon monoxide, or through direct action of carbon monoxide on the cartilaginous skeleton.

Rats exposed to boric acid on day 9 of gestation develop 6, rather than the normal number of 7 cervical vertebrae.¹¹² This has been associated with an alteration of hox gene expression pattern, presumably mediated by boric acid.

The influence of various teratogens on the expression of genes that influence vertebrate development has not been well studied. One possible model for the development of CS is multifactorial. An understanding of possible environmental influences on vertebrate development may help to provide more complete genetic counseling for families.

	DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
It is likely that different approaches will enable an elucidation of the genetic and environmental basis of CS. Recent advances in understanding spine development provide evidence for a genetic basis in the determination of a particular vertebrate identity during development. Since CS is due to localized alterations in vertebral body development as opposed to a more widespread distribution of vertebral malformations, a model needs to be developed that incorporates position identity and failure of segmentation. The association of renal, cardiac, skeletal and spinal cord malformations with CS may reflect the involvement of different genes that are associated with developmental pathways in several organs. The usual sporadic nature of CS could be due to tissue mosaicism. Synteny analysis of mouse candidate genes for CS holds some promise due to the close evolutionary relationship between mice and human beings. With the identification of additional genes in animal model systems that contribute to different stages of spine development, the list of candidate genes for CS will continue to grow. As genes are identified that contribute toward the development of IS, allelic mutations in these genes may also be responsible for the development of CS. Epidemiologic studies can provide assistance in determining whether various environmental factors contribute to CS. Microarray expression analysis in developing mice embryos may be used to investigate influences of various environmental factors on genes associated with spine development.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
The authors thank Shirley Thompson for her work on the figures, and also the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation for its support through the assistance of Alice Stargardt, Doreen Luepke and Dr. Graig Eldred in the preparation of this manuscript.

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 
Presented in part at the European Congress of Human Genetics Birmingham, England, May 3–6, 2003

GRANT SUPPORT: Medical Genetics Services (PFG) received support from Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison (RDB) received support from: 1) DAMD17-00-1-0071, U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, Ft. Detrick, MD, is the awarding and administering acquisition office. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. government, and no official endorsement should be inferred. 2) In part by a Veterans Affairs Merit award. Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery (CLR) received support from Beatrice and Samuel A. Seaver Foundation.

	REFERENCES

TOP Abstract INTRODUCTION ASSOCIATION OF CS WITH... MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH... GENETIC ASPECTS OF CS... OVERVIEW OF VERTEBRAL... USE OF SYNTENY ANALYSIS... METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WHICH MAY... DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK REFERENCES

 

1. Shands AR, Eisberg HB. The incidence of scoliosis in the state of Delaware. A study of 50,000 minifilms of the chest made during a survey for tuberculosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1955;37A:1243.
2. Wynne-Davies R. Congenital vertebral anomalies: aetiology and relationship to spina bifida cystica. J Med Genet 1975;12:280–288.[Abstract]
3. Alagille D, Odievre M, Gautier M, Dommergues JP. Hepatic ductular hypoplasia associated with characteristic facies, vertebral malformations, retarded physical, mental, and sexual development, and cardiac murmur. J Pediatr 1975;86:63–71.[ISI][Medline]
4. Mortier GR, Lachman RS, Bocian M, Rimoin DL. Multiple vertebral segmentation defects: analysis of 26 new patients and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 1996;61:310–319.[ISI][Medline]
5. Jarcho S, Levin PM. Hereditary malformations of the vertebral bodies. Johns Hopkins Med J 1938; 62:216.
6. Scoliosis Research Society. A glossary of scoliosis terms. Spine 1976;1:57–58.
7. Weinstein SL. The thoracolumbar spine. In: Weinstein SL, Buckwalter JA, editors. Turek’s orthopedics: Principles and their application. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company; 1994. p. 447–484.
8. Wynne-Davies R. Familial (idiopathic) scoliosis. A family survey. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1968;50:24–30.
9. Salehi LB, Mangino M, De Serio S, De Cicco D, Capon F, Semprini S, Pizzuti A, Novelli G, Dallapiccola B. Assignment of a locus for autosomal dominant idiopathic scoliosis (IS) to human chromosome 17p11. Hum Genet 2002;111:401–404.[ISI][Medline]
10. Winter RB. Posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis: indications, techniques, and results. Orthop Clin North Am 1979;10:787–800.[ISI][Medline]
11. Sillence DO, Barlow KK, Cole WG, Dietrich S, Garber AP, Rimoin DL. Osteogenesis imperfecta type III. Delineation of the phenotype with reference to genetic heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet 1986;23:821–832.[ISI][Medline]
12. Pyeritz RE, McKusick VA. The Marfan syndrome: diagnosis and management. N Engl J Med 1979;300:772–777.[ISI][Medline]
13. Ahmad NN, Ala-Kokko L, Knowlton RG, Jimenez SA, Weaver EJ, Maguire JI, Tasman W, Prockop DJ. Stop codon in the procollagen II gene (COL2A1) in a family with the Stickler syndrome (arthro-ophthalmopathy). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:6624–6627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Steinmann BU, Royce PM, Superti-Furga A. The Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. In: Royce PM, Steinmann BU, editors. Connective tissue and its heritable disorders: Molecular, genetic, and medical aspects. 5^th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1993. p. 351–407.
15. Emery AE. X-linked muscular dystrophy with early contrac-tures and cardiomyopathy (Emery-Dreifuss type). Clin Genet 1987;32:360–367.[ISI][Medline]
16. DeLuca PA. The musculoskeletal management of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Clin North Am 1996;43:1135–1150.[ISI][Medline]
17. Sarwark JF. Spina bifida. Pediatr Clin North Am 1996;43:1151–1158.[ISI][Medline]
18. Day GA, Upadhyay SS, Ho EK, Leong JC, Ip M. Pulmonary function in congenital scoliosis. Spine 1994;19:1027–1031.[ISI][Medline]
19. McMaster M, Ohtsuka K. The natural history of congenital scoliosis. A study of two hundred and fifty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1128–1147.[Free Full Text]
20. Winter RB, Moe JH, Eilers VE. Congenital scoliosis: a study of 234 patients treated and untreated. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1968;50:1–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F. Pain patterns in adult scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1988;19:339–345.[ISI][Medline]
22. Chetcuti P, Dickens DR, Phelan PD. Spinal deformity in patients born with oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula. Arch Dis Child 1989;64:1427–1430.[Abstract]
23. Loder RT, Dayioglu MM. Association of congenital vertebral malformations with bladder and cloacal exstrophy. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:389–393.[ISI][Medline]
24. Vitko RJ, Cass AS, Winter RB. Anomalies of the genitourinary tract associated with congenital scoliosis and congenital kyphosis. J Urol 1972;108:655–659.[ISI][Medline]
25. Cowell HR, MacEwen GD, Hubben C. Incidence of abnormalities of the kidney and ureter in congenital scoliosis. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1974;10:142–145.[Medline]
26. Maizels M, Stephens FD. The induction of urologic malformations. Understanding the relationship of renal ectopia and congenital scoliosis. Invest Urol 1979;17:209–217.[ISI][Medline]
27. Opitz JM. The developmental field concept in clinical genetics. J Pediatr 1982;101:805–809.[ISI][Medline]
28. Martinez-Frias ML, Urioste M. Segmentation anomalies of the vertebras and ribs: a developmental field defect: epidemio-logic evidence. Am J Med Genet 1994;49:36–44.[ISI][Medline]
29. Martinez-Frias ML, Frias JL. VACTERL as primary, polytopic developmental field defects. Am J Med Genet 1999;83:13–16.[ISI][Medline]
30. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:1061–1071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Nachemson AL, Peterson LE. Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:815–822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Brewer C, Holloway S, Zawalnyski P, Schinzel A, Fitzpatrick D. A chromosomal deletion map of human malformations. Am J Hum Genet 1998;63:1153–1159.[ISI][Medline]
33. Connor JM, Conner AN, Connor RA, Tolmie JL, Yeung B, Goudie D. Genetic aspects of early childhood scoliosis. Am J Med Genet 1987;27:419–424.[ISI][Medline]
34. Monaghan AP, Kaestner KH, Grau E, Schutz G. Postimplantation expression patterns indicate a role for the mouse forkhead/HNF-3 alpha, beta and gamma genes in determination of the definitive endoderm, chordamesoderm and neuroectoderm. Development 1993;119:567–578.[Abstract]
35. McKinley LM, Leatherman KD. Idiopathic and congenital scoliosis in twins. Spine 1978;3:227–229.[Medline]
36. Ogden JA, Southwick WO. Congenital and infantile scoliosis in triplets. Clin Orthop 1978;(136):176–178.
37. Pool RD. Congenital scoliosis in monozygotic twins. Genetically determined or acquired in utero? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:194–196.
38. Hattaway GL. Congenital scoliosis in one of monozygotic twins: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:837–838.[Free Full Text]
39. Cantu JM, Urrusti J, Rosales G, Rojas A. Evidence for autoso-mal recessive inheritance of costovertebral dysplasia. Clin Genet 1971;2:149–154.[Medline]
40. Rivera H, Perez-Salas JM, Nazara Z, Ramirez ML. A probably distinct autosomal recessive thoraco-limb dysplasia. J Med Genet 1988;25:619–622.[Abstract]
41. Lorenz P, Rupprecht E. Spondylocostal dysostosis: dominant type. Am J Med Genet 1990;35:219–221.[ISI][Medline]
42. Giacoia GP, Say B. Spondylocostal dysplasia and neural tube defects. J Med Genet 1991;28:51–53.[Abstract]
43. Romeo MG, Distefano G, Di Bella D, Mangiagli A, Caltabiano L, Roccaro S, Mollica F. Familial Jarcho-Levin syndrome. Clin Genet 1991;39:253–259.[ISI][Medline]
44. Turnpenny PD, Bulman MP, Frayling TM, Abu-Nasra TK, Garrett C, Hattersley AT, Ellard S. A gene for autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis maps to 19q13.1-q13.3. Am J Hum Genet 1999;65:175–182.[ISI][Medline]
45. Bulman MP, Kusumi K, Frayling TM, McKeown C, Garrett C, Lander ES, Krumlauf R, Hattersley AT, Ellard S, Turnpenny PD. Mutations in the human delta homologue, DLL3, cause axial skeletal defects in spondylocostal dysostosis. Nat Genet 2000;24:438–441.[ISI][Medline]
46. Langer LO Jr, Moe JH. A recessive form of congenital scoliosis different from spondylothoracic dysplasia. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1975;11:83–86.
47. Purkiss SB, Driscoll B, Cole WG, Alman B. Idiopathic scoliosis in families of children with congenital scoliosis. Clin Orthop 2002;(401):27–31.
48. Chevallier A. [Role of the somitic mesoderm in the development of the rib cage of bird embryos. I. Origin of the sternal component and conditions for the development of the ribs (author’s transl)]. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1975;33:291–311.[ISI][Medline]
49. McGinnis W, Garber RL, Wirz J, Kuroiwa A, Gehring WJ. A homologous protein-coding sequence in Drosophila homeotic genes and its conservation in other metazoans. Cell 1984;37:403–408.