CM&R
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Medicine & Research
Volume 1, Number 1 : 37 -42
doi:
© 2003 Marshfield Clinic
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meece, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meece, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, K. D.


Original Research

Mosquito Surveillance for West Nile Virus in Southeastern Wisconsin – 2002

Jennifer K. Meece, PhD

Center for Tropical Disease Research and Training, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, and Clinical Research Center, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin

James S. Henkel, BS

University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse, LaCrosse, Wisconsin

Linda Glaser, DVM

Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, Madison, Wisconsin

Kurt D. Reed, MD

Clinical Research Center, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin

REPRINT REQUESTS: Jennifer Meece, PhD, Clinical Research Center, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449, Telephone: 715-389-5142, Fax: 715-389-3808, Email: meece.jennifer{at}marshfieldclinic.org

[See related article: 5–12]

In 2001, West Nile virus (WNV) was identified among dead American crows and bluejays in five counties in southeastern Wisconsin. In response to the introduction of WNV, a pilot mosquito surveillance program was initiated in these five southeastern Wisconsin counties during the summer of 2002. Forty sites were selected for surveillance one night each week during a 17-week period. Mosquitoes were collected in carbon dioxide-baited light traps and gravid traps. During the study period 31,419 mosquitoes were collected, identified to species level and pooled into groups of up to 50 mosquitoes of like species from each collection site. Twenty-five different mosquito species were identified with the common pest mosquitoes, Aedes vexans and Ochlerotatus trivittatus, being the most abundant. Seventeen of the 25 mosquito species found in southeastern Wisconsin have previously been shown to be carriers of WNV in other parts of the U.S. Only 2/1,592 (0.126%) mosquito pools from Wisconsin were positive for WNV by cell culture and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Active mosquito surveillance is useful for identifying potential mosquito vectors of arboviruses in defined geographic areas, and to monitor population densities of those vectors. This information coupled with infection rate data can help guide public health policies related to vector control, and may help reduce the impact on human, veterinary and bird mortality.


Key Words: Mosquito • West Nile virus • Surveillance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
K. Madden
West Nile Virus Infection and its Neurological Manifestations
Clin. Med. Res., April 1, 2003; 1(2): 145 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by Marshfield Clinic.